Discussion about this post

User's avatar
oraxx's avatar

Conservative Christians are usually the first people to claim they're being persecuted, and yet no group would be quicker to persecute others if given the chance. The rights of gay people, along with many other groups, wouldn't last fifteen minutes in the hands of this girl's father. The prospect of spending eternity with conservative Christians isn't the selling point they would have us believe it is.

Expand full comment
Joan the Dork's avatar

Yeah, no. Fuck both of them. The school shouldn't allow students to wear clothing that is overtly hateful towards others. "But it's in the bible!" 𝘚𝘰 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘺 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘣𝘪𝘨𝘰𝘵. Just because it's in the bible does not mean it should be acceptable for you to wear it on a t-shirt to school.

Allowing that shirt is not upholding free speech, it's providing a free pass to do harm; one person's rights end where those of others begin. It has also long been held that some of students' rights may be curtailed while on campus for the purpose of keeping order and providing all students with a safe environment to learn in. Sooner or later, a gay kid may have had to sit across from that shirt in class, and they wouldn't have the choice to just look the other way. If the school wouldn't allow a student to wear a shirt that says "Hitler was right" or "white power" or "go back where you came from," then this should be prohibited too.

I agree with Hemant that school admins dropped the ball by making this about sex and not hate... but the case should have gone hard against the Penkoskis, and the other case in Ohio in 2005 was wrongly decided as well. The existence of LGBTQ people is not "political." Wearing a shirt that condemns our existence is therefore not "political speech." It's hate speech. It should not be protected, no matter which book the hater sourced it from.

Expand full comment
179 more comments...

No posts