Oklahoma sued over school standards that mix Christianity with right-wing lies
The lawsuit says Ryan Walters' social studies standards promote religion and conservative lies, and that he violated state law to make it happen
This newsletter is free and goes out to over 22,000 subscribers, but it’s only able to sustain itself due to the support I receive from a small percentage of regular readers. Would you please consider becoming one of those supporters? You can use the button below to subscribe to Substack or use my usual Patreon page!
A group of nearly three dozen parents, students, religious leaders, atheists, and teachers has sued Oklahoma’s Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters and the State Department of Education in order to prevent right-wing, conspiracy-driven, and deeply religious state standards for public school social studies classes from going into effect.
The Plaintiffs are backed by Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law and Justice.
Those standards, passed in December and effectively ignored by the Republican legislature (which had the power to block them) in May, will require teachers to tell kids that the 2020 election had major “discrepancies” (it did not) and that COVID originated in a Chinese lab (there’s no conclusive proof of that). Students will not be required, however, to learn about George Floyd's death or the Black Lives Matter movement.
In addition to that, the standards treat the Bible as a foundational document, treating religious mythology as historical fact.
It’s all part of Walters’ ongoing efforts to brainwash children. In fact, he quietly modified the (already awful) standards before the State Board of Education voted on them, without giving them any real time to notice what he’d done.
Why the initial state standards for social studies were a problem
You may recall that, back in December, the draft standards made national news because they were full of religious indoctrination. Walters even bragged in his press release that the new standards “mention the Bible and its historical impact over 40 times.”
The new standards are among the strongest in the country: pro- America, pro-American exceptionalism, and strengthen civics and constitutional studies across every grade. They include Supt. Walters Bible curriculum recommendations and mention the Bible and its historical impact over 40 times.
…
“Oklahoma is putting the Bible and the historical impact of Christianity back in school. We are demanding that our children learn the full and true context of our nation’s founding and of the principles that made and continue to make America great and exceptional,” said Walters. “I am proud that Oklahoma is taking the lead in putting President Trump’s education agenda into practice. We are presenting a successful model that others can emulate for how to restore public education and eradicate radical woke influences from our schools.
What were some of those lessons?
First graders would be taught the “purpose and meaning” of the Pledge of Allegiance “and the significance of the phrase ‘under God.’”
First graders would also have to explain the meaning of “In God we trust” and “the importance of religion to American people”… even though, if recent surveys are accurate, Americans have grown decidedly less religious over the past several decades.
Second graders would be taught “stories from Christianity that influenced the American colonists, Founders, and culture, including the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth (e.g., the “Golden Rule,” the Sermon on the Mount).”
That wording suggested a strain of Christian Nationalism promoted by pseudo-historian David Barton. Many of the Founders, and certainly the foundational documents of the country, were not influenced by Christianity. And the Golden Rule was not a Jesus Original™.
That same lie made its way into 8th grade classes, too, since students would have to “Evaluate the role of Judeo-Christian ideals in supporting colonial demands for independence, as exemplified by the Bible being a frequently cited authority by America's Founders.” (Spoiler: It wasn’t a frequently cited authority.)
For high school students, the indoctrination was even stronger. Christianity and slavery were only connected through Christian humanitarians who called for its abolition, not how the Bible was often used to justify enslavement.
It was no different in U.S. Government classes, where students would have to describe how the Constitution “was influenced by religion, morality, and the Bible as a frequently cited authority by America's founders.”
When it came to world history, the Bible was treated as a historical text. Students were supposed to describe how Christianity worked in ancient Rome, including “the meanings and effects of Jesus of Nazareth’s words as recorded by Matthew.”
An elective class on the “History of 20th Century Totalitarianism” offered Christianity as the alternative to Communism, laughably called on students to understand “the Christian idea of the equality of souls, the Christian ideal of charity, and the renunciation of worldly wealth.” (None of those things describe the current Republican Party that is backed by the vast majority of white evangelicals.)
The standards also asked students to summarize “the political impact of President Clinton’s impeachment”… but made no mention of Donald Trump’s two impeachments.
When the standards were that egregiously right-wing, you had to wonder who wrote them. And the answer wasn’t surprising.
[Walters] said members of that 10-person [executive review] committee would include the co-founder of the conservative nonprofit PragerU, a representative from the conservative American Enterprise Institute and the president of another conservative group, the Heritage Foundation, along with multiple other right-wing voices. Only three of the people on the executive committee have ever lived in Oklahoma.
There are no Oklahoma public-school teachers or administrators on the executive committee, although there were about 75 of them who worked on updating the standards.
And yet somehow, Walters has made these standards even worse.
Why the revised state standards for social studies are an even bigger problem
In February, the State Board of Education was supposed to vote on approving those Bible-heavy standards. They considered delaying the vote since Gov. Kevin Stitt had appointed three new members to the group, but Walters urged them to hurry it along. He was in a very big rush for some reason. He insisted it was so the legislature could get their hands on it in time… even though the Board could easily have voted a month later with no consequences.
What he didn’t tell them was that he had modified the standards to add more right-wing conspiracies while removing certain elements he didn’t want students to learn about.
Walters did not send the new standards with his additions to the members of the board until 4 p.m. the day before the board’s 9:30 a.m. meeting. This did not give members enough time to read the new standards, which are around 400 pages long. Some of the members said later that they did not even realize that the new standards were different from the earlier version that they had previously reviewed.
The changes weren’t discovered until weeks after the Board of Education voted to give the standards a green light. They were first reported by the outlet NonDoc.
What had Walters changed? Consider a U.S. History course for 9th graders.
The initial version of the standards listed a handful of things that students needed to understand from the first Trump administration: changes in foreign policy, the impact of George Floyd’s death, the response to COVID, issues related to the 2020 election (presumably including the events of January 6).
The revised version that got approved was much more specific—and much more conspiratorial. It says COVID originated in a Chinese lab, insists there were “discrepancies” in the 2020 election, falsely claims there were security risks with mail-in ballots and “sudden batch dumps,” etc.
Identify discrepancies in 2020 elections results by looking at graphs and other information, including the sudden halting of ballot-counting in select cities in key battleground states, the security risks of mail-in balloting, sudden batch dumps, an unforeseen record number of voters, and the unprecedented contradiction of “bellwether county” trends.
The initial version had a section on the “challenges and accomplishments” of Joe Biden’s presidency that included economic recovery after COVID and the bipartisan infrastructure bill.
The revised version only focuses on the challenges, not the accomplishments:
The initial version asked students to compare Judeo-Christian beliefs to Communism by highlighting the “Christian idea of the equality of souls, the Christian ideal of charity, and the renunciation of worldly wealth.” (Yes, that’s incredibly ironic given the current administration.)
The revised version removes that section entirely.
None of these changes were made public prior to them being voted on, and Walters didn’t mention them when he was pressuring the Board to cast their votes in favor of it.
If those standards went into effect, they would also creates a different problem for public schools: Finding textbooks that cover these topics.
[Democratic Sen. Mark] Mann pointed out that standards which deviate too far from established facts can make it hard for textbook companies to write textbooks for the state.
“When you start deviating from what is the norm and the truth and start coming up with your own truths and throwing in the Bible and election denying and all that, there’s going to come a point where Oklahoma won’t have a textbook publisher willing to align to our standards and sell a book in Oklahoma because it’s very expensive to align,” Mann said. “But when you’ve got Oklahoma, Texas — other states — and they’re redoing their standards, it’s not a huge alignment if you’re sticking to facts.”
Oklahoma Republicans refused to block these standards from taking effect
The easiest way to prevent these standards from going into effect would have been for the legislature to reject Walters’ ideologically driven agenda. They had the power to do that!
State law says that, “By adoption of a joint resolution, the Legislature shall approve the standards, disapprove the standards in whole or in part, amend the standards in whole or in part or disapprove the standards in whole or in part with instructions to the State Board of Education.”
If the joint resolution is vetoed by the governor and the veto hasn’t been overridden, the standards are deemed to be approved. The same would apply if the Legislature fails to adopt a joint resolution within 30 legislative days following the submission of the standards.”
But when there was a resolution to block the standards from getting approved, Oklahoma Republicans just looked the other way:
Republicans who objected to the process the standards went through filed a resolution last week to block it, but that resolution didn’t make the floor agenda on Tuesday.
"Following a lengthy conversation Monday, the caucus was not on board with rejecting the standards based on the process in which they were presented to the board of education," Sen. Pro Tem Lonnie Paxton's office told KOCO 5 in a statement. "The standards are not a legislative obligation, and the curriculum is developed by the State Department of Education."
That meant the standards were automatically approved. Beginning this fall, students will be lied to because Ryan Walters cares more about appeasing Donald Trump than preparing students for the future.
The simple fact is that college admissions counselors would now have to think twice before admitting Oklahoma high schoolers because there’s no guarantee they have the proper history background to succeed in those college-level classes.
Remember that this wasn’t just one bad move by Walters. It was the latest in a long series of them.
Walters, after all, is the guy who requested (then canceled) bids to purchase 55,000 Trump bibles for public school classrooms, then purchased 500 Trump bibles for use in Advanced Placement Government classes anyway. (Even though there’s no requirement for teachers to use the Bible in the classroom, Walters has repeatedly pushed them to do exactly that, many superintendents have rejected the idea, and there’s an ongoing lawsuit to prevent Walters’ plans from being enacted.)
But these social studies standards, now riddled with right-wing conspiracies, were just another way for him to inject Christianity where it doesn’t belong. Walters could pretend this wasn’t about inflicting his religion and political views upon children, but his public statements all pointed in that direction. Instead of openly saying he wanted to convert kids, he just claimed Christianity was intertwined with American history, giving him a secular rationale for his religious goals. Instead of saying he wanted to brainwash kids with Fox News lies, his office said it was all about educating them and getting kids to “think for themselves”:
“The left has hijacked our education system. We have teachers outright teaching our kids to hate our country and our leaders. Not in Oklahoma. In teaching our standards, we believe in giving the next generation the ability to think for themselves rather than accepting radical positions on the election outcome as it is reported by the media.”
It’s a lot easier to get kids to believe lies when you refuse to ever tell them the truth.
What the lawsuit says
When the standards went into effect, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law and Justice issued a statement condemning the new standards and saying they planned to take action.
That’s what they’ve now done with their lawsuit, representing an impressive and broad range of Plaintiffs who argue Walters’ standards violate their religious freedom. They go on to say that they “oppose their tax dollars being spent on education standards that promote religion and inaccuracies.”
There’s a litany of laws violated, they say, by what Walters did:
The standards voted on by the Board of Education were never released to the public in advance (since Walters modified them without telling anyone), violating the state’s Open Meeting Act.
By voting on standards without knowing their content, the Board violated a law requiring it to have authority over academic standards.
Forcing teachers to spread lies violates a law requiring information taught to children to be accurate.
Spreading Christian propaganda to children violates a law requiring age-appropriate standards.
By promoting Christianity above other faiths and no faith, the standards violate the Oklahoma Constitution.
The lawsuit asks the court to invalidate the new standards, prevent Walters and his allies from implementing them in the coming school year, and continue using the old standards until a new set (consistent with the law) can be approved.
To make their point, the lawsuit uses many of Walters’ old comments against him, specifically citing his repeated admissions that he was trying to shove Christianity into public schools.
In an April 1, 2025 social-media post, Walters stated, “Oklahoma is standing strong, ensuring students have access to the Bible as a vital cornerstone of our history and values,” and depicted Oklahoma as participating in a “movement to restore our nation’s moral foundation”… In an April 29, 2025 social-media post, Walters stated, “As part of these standards, the Bible will now be recognized as a foundational text, helping students understand its undeniable influence on our nation’s history and values”…
In a May 13, 2025 interview with One America News, Walters was asked, “Are you bringing the Word? Are you bringing God? Are you bringing Jesus back to the classroom in Oklahoma?” Walters responded, “We are”… In a June 2, 2025 interview with Real America’s Voice, Walters stated, “We want our kids to… understand where this country’s values came from. So, we… increased the standards dramatically. We put the Bible back in”… In a June 3, 2025 interview with News 9, Walters stated, “I will not stop fighting… for our kids to understand the Judeo-Christian values that the country was founded on”… In a June 4, 2025 interview with Fox News, Walters stated that “[w]e cannot tolerate” those who “have taken the Judeo-Christian values . . . out of our schools”…
In a June 6, 2025 interview with KOTV, Walters stated that the United States Supreme Court had “lo[st] their mind” by “driving God and prayer out of school,” that “[w]e’re going to have prayer in school in Oklahoma,” and that “[w]e’re going to have the Bible in school in Oklahoma”… On June 9, 2025, Walters reposted on social media an article in which he was quoted as saying, “We are a country that was built with Judeo-Christian values… You don’t have America if you don’t have that Christian foundation… We brought it back to our schools.”
They also point out that many historians don’t treat the Bible as accurate history. It contains “numerous inconsistencies,” the accounts of certain characters were “written long after the apparent settings they describe,” and scholars generally treat certain biblical accounts as “literary works that were written to serve ideological and theological goals—not to document literal history.”
Some Christians, for example, hold the religious belief that the Bible is historically factual, while numerous other Christians and non-Christians do not… The 2025 Standards thus take sides in a religious debate about how to interpret and utilize a particular religious text.
This isn’t just about stopping Walters from injecting his religion into public schools. It’s about preventing money from being spent implementing these new standards. Remember: Schools will have to buy new textbooks and material to align with Walters’ Christian propaganda campaign. Teachers will have to be trained in the new material. And, of course, taxpayer funds will be used to have these standards taught in classrooms.
The lead Plaintiff in this case—Rev. Dr. Mitch Randall v. Ryan Walters—is the Rev. Dr. Mitch Randall, a Baptist minister. And he took aim at the variety of ways Walters’ campaign violated everything he stands for:
As a Christian, I object to Oklahoma’s new social studies standards that require teachers to deceive students by presenting inaccurate information as fact. To reduce the Bible to a history book—rather than treating it as a theological text – does a disservice to public school students, their families, their teachers and those who consider the Bible to be a book of faith. As a member of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, I am especially bothered by my tax dollars supporting state-mandated religious instruction. It’s a painful reminder of the forced religious proselytization my family members experienced in Native American boarding schools in Oklahoma. I urge the court to protect religious freedom for all Oklahomans and prevent implementation of these new standards.
Keep in mind that, by one measure, Oklahoma ranks near the bottom (49!) of the worst states in the country when it comes to education. Ryan Walters will not stop until his state ends up even lower on the list.
Republicans in Oklahoma are apparently very eager to help him get there. But the courts, including a State Supreme Court that rightly rejected Walters’ previous attempt to launch a taxpayer-funded religious school—shouldn’t help them dismantle public education even more.
This lawsuit very clearly lays out all the ways Walters violated the law to pass these standards. Any competent judge should be able to strike them down without straining for justification.
(Portions of this article were published earlier)
The people who would break down the barriers between church and state make a point of ignoring the fact the U.S. Constitution does not give religion any role to play in governance, and specifically bans religious tests for holding public office. David Barton may as well be calling himself an astronaut rather than a historian. The religious right never stops trying to shoehorn their mythology into places it was never intended to fit in the first place. I can't imagine why any young person would want to remain in Oklahoma. My grand daughter and her now husband graduated from OU, they loved the university, but could not get out of that state fast enough once they were done with college.
𝐹𝑖𝑟𝑠𝑡 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 “𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔” 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑃𝑙𝑒𝑑𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝐴𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 “𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝ℎ𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑒 ‘𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐺𝑜𝑑.’”
So, would a first grader be marked as wrong for accurately stating that the original purpose of the pledge was to sell flags to schools to mark the 400th anniverary of Columbus' first voyage? And that the meaning was the promotion of racism and xenophobia? And that the significance of the phrase "under God" was to promote McCarthyism? Would a teacher be fired for teaching that accurate history? It's Oklahoma. Walters would want to do the firing himself.
Skipping to Hig School:
𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑒 ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐵𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑙𝑦 𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑏𝑦 𝐴𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎'𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠.
How was the Constitution influenced by religion? The framers decided religion should have no part. Morality? The basic societal norms of the day, with provisions to change the Constitution as societal norms changed. The Bible? Although some of them cited the Bible as a guide, many did not, and the Constitution reflects that. If the kid uses these (factually correct) answers, they would likely not be allowed to graduate.
These are just a few of the examples why Rev Dr Mitchell's statement, (𝐼𝑡’𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑢𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑚𝑦 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐴𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑏𝑜𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑂𝑘𝑙𝑎ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑎.) is accurate. Hopefully, the judges will see this, and rule appropriately. But it is Oklahoma.