Translation: she didn't care about the issue at all until her favorite hack propagandist started lying about it- and now she has Very Strong Opinions, and feels obligated to share them with everyone... despite not having a single original thought about the matter, much less any personal stake in it.
But hey, I'm sure that parroting genocidal talking points couldn't go horribly wrong for anybody. The leopards surely won't eat 𝘩𝘦𝘳 face!
Like a lot of right wingers, she posts her opinions with the perfect confidence the whole world agrees with her. Such folks most often assume there will never be any consequences for their behavior, and can't understand it when they come. I'm a straight person, but would never patronize any business that refused to serve gay people and the trans-gendered.
It's a freaking haircut. I can't fathom why even a conservative would refuse service to someone over this.
I mean, if I were a salon owner and someone came in with a maga hat insisting I only use cis pronouns when talking to them, I'd do it and cut their hair. Because while you may leave your money with me, your assholery walks out the door with you.
Or, she lives in a bubble of like minded people who are loud and threatening enough to silence anyone who disagrees. “I mean why look for unnecessary conflict; right?” Where she lives, she may not be the majority, most likely isn’t, she’s just created a climate around her that allows her to think so.
This is the thing, the conservatives are not the majority, they’re not even all that large a minority, they’re just loud and confident and pushy, and violent. They’ve worked the system to their advantage, gerrymandering, voter suppression, violent rhetoric, violent actions, and bullied people into silence and hiding. They lie about their opponents or the other positions (like claiming the + is about pedophilia, or there are litter boxes for furries in middle schools and other crap) and the media buys into it. They actively avoid anything that might contradict their preferred reality, seek only comforting lies.
I bet there is a conclave of MAGA people in her area, I doubt it is the majority.
Her extreme views may not be the majority, but there is a significant percentage of the population there that does agree with her. Trump only won that county by a few percentage points, so there is a slight conservative majority, but not all of them fell down the Q rabbit hole.
Possibly so. I can only hope she finds out otherwise. Most business owners know better than go down this road, which tells me her business may fail for other reasons.
But now, if and when it does, she'll be able to blame her own shortcomings as a boss on woke mobs and cancel culture, and milk a martyrbation grand tour on Fox out of the whole affair! Galaxy brain move. We've truly got a 4-D chess player on our hands here.
Clearly this is not how she perceives the situation, since she promtly turned her entire web presence private.
Whether she loses business over this, gains business, or neither is anybody's guess. But the fact that she's trying to scrub it from the internet seems to indicate *she* feels it's going to be bad for her.
My guess is she was expecting many more positive responses than negative but got the reverse, and had an "oh sh1t" moment.
Welp, I guess that's one way to keep it classy. /s
With that charming combination of dehumanization, name calling, and attempted bullying, I wouldn't want her so much as running a comb though my hair. Claiming she's fine with the LGB but not the TQ+ comes off as some sort of attempt to pretend her position is reasonable, the + is intended to be inclusive, not add criminals to the abbreviation. Honestly, this woman has apparently been in the right wing echo chamber long enough she's convinced she's taking a stand for some sort of values when she should be sitting down and thinking for herself.
2. "Hey you" is often fine. Tbh, it's your own customer reviews you influence when you are rude to your customers.
3. You are free to refuse service for *legal* reasons. Not illegal ones. And yes you are bound by nondiscrimination laws the same way realtors may be.
4. "Conservatives have had enough" is a completely invalid justification, since SCOTUS has ruled about *religious* freedom, not political ideology freedom. But thank you for providing future plainiff lawyers with a quote that demonstrates your objection is not religious, it's political.
5. "Letting them be" would be serving them and using their preferred pronouns, not kicking them out. The same way that if Robert comes into your store and says "call me Bob," the way you "let it be" is call them Bob and give them a haircut.
That may be a possibility, but that would undermine his claims to the presidency. If he’s not fit for trial, he certainly couldn’t be fit to run the country.
If the Western Inland Sea were to fill in again, Vegas wouldn't even be close. The bible belt would be underwater as would Wyoming, but Cali, the PNW, and New England would be fine.
"Though Nevada is a desert, it was once entirely submerged hundreds of millions of years ago. The state experienced everything from warm, shallow seas to deep ocean basins. Reefs were common, and evidence of their existence can still be found today in fossils. Animals such as the ichthyosaur once swam in the waters that covered the state, as did ancient plankton and fish."
You alluded to it already - the salon probably already has serviced someone trans. But that doesn't matter. Nor does this specific case matter, it's just the first drops before the dam breaks. The wider fundamental religious ideology has found a new toy designed on the dais of SCOTUS and delivered by the milquetoast media to allow people with low self control to be assholes in public cloaked in religious finery. When your government is actively finding ways to bring about suffering for select people, is that a government for the people, by the people? Should it exist in the framework of our Constitution at all?
Geesh. I'm really old. I thought "Lew Ayres and Lionel Barrymore," though I am fully aware of Chamberlain's more recent (though even that is old) portrayal. Vince Edwards passed in '96, but Chamberlain is still around.
The Supreme Court notwithstanding, finding exceptions to laws of general applicability which forbid discrimination simply underlines why we have those laws to begin with.
Any person in any service industry, whether wedding photography, website design, or hairdressing should understand that the only face a client should ever see is pleasant, interested, concerned, and polite. Back in my working days, I made a lot of money because of the other photographers who didn't understand this simple fact.
She has decided that her tribal politics are more important than her customer relations. She has FA'd. May she find out, and soon.
Thanks! After speaking regarding the voucher bill in a House subcommittee back in January, the famous Raygun folks reached out to ask if they could make shirts. Of course! Huge flattery! I sent them the artwork. I believe I made it in Paint in like 2 minutes. It's deliberately bad....and the best I can do.😉
"She added that anyone who uses personal pronouns wouldn’t be welcome either."
I doubt it's possible to hold an intelligent conversation on any subject without using personal pronouns. The fact that so may conservatives/christians can't seem to understand that is difficult to fathom. Do they not get the concept of what pronouns are, or what? It's tempting to put this down as one more failure of America's education system, like their ignorance of science, the Constitution and a host of other things, but I daresay this is more like WILLFUL ignorance. They claim to have free will, after all; it's not much of a stretch to assume their near-total ignorance must be a product of their will.
"If a human identifies as anything other than a man/woman..."
Honeybun, trans people DO identify as men and women, because that's exactly what they are. Get it?
"This is a free country and I am not a slave to any narrative." Except the narrative in a 3000-year old collection of preposterous stories, of course.
As for your damnfool nonsense about how your kind used to just let LGBT people alone to be ourselves, yes, absolutely--you left us alone to live in constant feat of arrest, assault, unemployment, imprisonment, castration, electroshock, losing our families, and whatever other foul rewards you felt like dishing out to us. The days when people like you were free to treat us any way you chose are long gone, and if you think we'll go compliantly back to living that kind of life, you damn well better REthink.
Beat me to it by "just now" – it could be that there are languages without personal pronouns, but it's difficult to get around in English without them.
I am not sure it's possible for a culture who use a spoken language even if they would function like a hive (the Borgs). We/you, at least, would be necessary.
Well, they 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 had enough. They've had 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 than enough. They've had nearly everything, and balked at being asked to give up even the tiniest slivers so that anyone else could have anything at all.
Bet Geiger has no issues providing service to customers who are either on their second or third marriages or cheating on their spouses. Then it's "Don't ask, don't tell."
Must be tough for her to carry a double standard into battle.
I had a conversation with someone who said a previous marriage or having a kid isn't something that you wouldn't know unless they told you about it, while being a homosexual couple is obvious and they're in your face about it as part of the homosexual agenda.
All those hideous golden-domed houses of jeezyboy's hatred are not making a statement about their satan spawn jesus with its stone age superstitions and ignorance?
I don't understand why she even does women's hair. The bible clearly states that women
1 Corinthians 11:6 "For if a woman does not cover her head, she might as well have her hair cut off; but if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should cover her head."
and "Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, 15 but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering. 16 If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God.
So women must cover their head and must not cut their hair.
My very first job was with a veterinarian who assigned me "pet bather, dog groomer" position. I got pretty good at it. Came in handy later on, giving all my punk rock buddies "creative" hair styles, including mohawks. :D
But poodles were the most fun to trim. I'd do all kinds of funny things before finalizing the cut.
I would have loved to see how you wrestle a dog (28 kg with a innate knowledge of inertia) who hate being wet into bathing. For once, Aria was the more reasonable of the two and could be convinced to go in the bathroom without too much fuss.
As Clarence Thomas said, "While I did not except our ruling on the free speech and the religious rights would be used to oppress minority communities and no one could have foreseen us saying that it is ok, would result in people thinking that it was ok. But now that it has happened, I fully support it. And it has not gone far enough."
As John Roberts said as he stuck his fingers in his ears., "Our ruling won't cause persecution of minority groups. NANANANANANA I CAN"T HEAR YOU!!!"
As Brett Kavanaugh said, "This just proves that white male men are the actual victims here. Also if one were to butt chug a bud lite, hypothetically, does that make that supreme court justice gay? Just asking for a friend. Hypothetically."
What are you talking about Clarence is white. I can prove it. Does he have a poor understand of other people's problems, and then demands that other people share his ill-convinced notions? Has he ever abused a position of power and then got offended that someone would point it out? Does he demand two sets of rules of ethics, one for him and one for you? Does he have a golf club membership? Do black women make him uncomfortable? He is as white as snow.
“We used to “just let them be”. Most of us kept our opinions to ourselves. I mean why look for unnecessary conflict; right?“
Does “just let them be” mean beating them to death?
I’m confused.
And not hiring them, or giving them housing, or medical care... You know, leaving them be to die.
Translation: she didn't care about the issue at all until her favorite hack propagandist started lying about it- and now she has Very Strong Opinions, and feels obligated to share them with everyone... despite not having a single original thought about the matter, much less any personal stake in it.
But hey, I'm sure that parroting genocidal talking points couldn't go horribly wrong for anybody. The leopards surely won't eat 𝘩𝘦𝘳 face!
Like a lot of right wingers, she posts her opinions with the perfect confidence the whole world agrees with her. Such folks most often assume there will never be any consequences for their behavior, and can't understand it when they come. I'm a straight person, but would never patronize any business that refused to serve gay people and the trans-gendered.
It's a freaking haircut. I can't fathom why even a conservative would refuse service to someone over this.
I mean, if I were a salon owner and someone came in with a maga hat insisting I only use cis pronouns when talking to them, I'd do it and cut their hair. Because while you may leave your money with me, your assholery walks out the door with you.
She may live in a community where her views are the majority and so feels safe.
Or, she lives in a bubble of like minded people who are loud and threatening enough to silence anyone who disagrees. “I mean why look for unnecessary conflict; right?” Where she lives, she may not be the majority, most likely isn’t, she’s just created a climate around her that allows her to think so.
This is the thing, the conservatives are not the majority, they’re not even all that large a minority, they’re just loud and confident and pushy, and violent. They’ve worked the system to their advantage, gerrymandering, voter suppression, violent rhetoric, violent actions, and bullied people into silence and hiding. They lie about their opponents or the other positions (like claiming the + is about pedophilia, or there are litter boxes for furries in middle schools and other crap) and the media buys into it. They actively avoid anything that might contradict their preferred reality, seek only comforting lies.
I bet there is a conclave of MAGA people in her area, I doubt it is the majority.
Her extreme views may not be the majority, but there is a significant percentage of the population there that does agree with her. Trump only won that county by a few percentage points, so there is a slight conservative majority, but not all of them fell down the Q rabbit hole.
Possibly so. I can only hope she finds out otherwise. Most business owners know better than go down this road, which tells me her business may fail for other reasons.
But now, if and when it does, she'll be able to blame her own shortcomings as a boss on woke mobs and cancel culture, and milk a martyrbation grand tour on Fox out of the whole affair! Galaxy brain move. We've truly got a 4-D chess player on our hands here.
Clearly this is not how she perceives the situation, since she promtly turned her entire web presence private.
Whether she loses business over this, gains business, or neither is anybody's guess. But the fact that she's trying to scrub it from the internet seems to indicate *she* feels it's going to be bad for her.
My guess is she was expecting many more positive responses than negative but got the reverse, and had an "oh sh1t" moment.
You may be right.
Of course she's safe from LGBTQ+ rights advocates and allies. But sure as the sun will rise, the leopards will eventually start on her face.
Nothing says “I own my convictions “ like deleting your social media accounts and hiding.
I believe it's called a "Sir Robin maneuver" or an inverted advance.
"Bravely ran away, away..."
Welp, I guess that's one way to keep it classy. /s
With that charming combination of dehumanization, name calling, and attempted bullying, I wouldn't want her so much as running a comb though my hair. Claiming she's fine with the LGB but not the TQ+ comes off as some sort of attempt to pretend her position is reasonable, the + is intended to be inclusive, not add criminals to the abbreviation. Honestly, this woman has apparently been in the right wing echo chamber long enough she's convinced she's taking a stand for some sort of values when she should be sitting down and thinking for herself.
It sounds to me like thinking is outside of her skill set.
1. Trans folk generally identify as men/women.
2. "Hey you" is often fine. Tbh, it's your own customer reviews you influence when you are rude to your customers.
3. You are free to refuse service for *legal* reasons. Not illegal ones. And yes you are bound by nondiscrimination laws the same way realtors may be.
4. "Conservatives have had enough" is a completely invalid justification, since SCOTUS has ruled about *religious* freedom, not political ideology freedom. But thank you for providing future plainiff lawyers with a quote that demonstrates your objection is not religious, it's political.
5. "Letting them be" would be serving them and using their preferred pronouns, not kicking them out. The same way that if Robert comes into your store and says "call me Bob," the way you "let it be" is call them Bob and give them a haircut.
All of this.
Or just call them by their name and leave the pronouns out of it.
There's a Dr. Strange-style joke in this somewhere.
"Hi, I'm Bob, I'd like a haircut. A crewcut, actually"
"Sally, show Mr. Bob to a chair. He'd like a crewcut."
"I prefer 'she.'"
"Sally, show Mr. She to a chair..."
Perfect!
*coughs*
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-questions-whether-ocean-could-063036283.html
Former President Donald Trump declared that Las Vegas could “maybe someday” have an ocean at a campaign stop there on Saturday.
Not only will it have one ocean, there might be 11 or even 12 oceans there.
Bigly oceans.
It's unbelievable, folks...
Is he trying to lay the groundwork for an insanity defense for his many upcoming trials?
That may be a possibility, but that would undermine his claims to the presidency. If he’s not fit for trial, he certainly couldn’t be fit to run the country.
When was he ever fit to run the country?
Never, but then there’s some concrete evidence for the Dems to use to unseat him.
With their press secretary? They'd end up convincing people that he *is* a genius.
"If he’s not fit for trial, he certainly couldn’t be fit to run the country."
In the GOP that's not a certainty.
Just throw some jelly beans at him, then dub over his chewing. Worked for Reagan.
Can I throw bricks instead?
I don’t mind, but the secret service might have something to say about it.
Scatter Legos under his bare feet.
Jelly Belly®
I prefer Bassett's Jelly Babies.
Mmmmm...baaaaybeeeeee...
If the Western Inland Sea were to fill in again, Vegas wouldn't even be close. The bible belt would be underwater as would Wyoming, but Cali, the PNW, and New England would be fine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Interior_Seaway
But he's a very stable genius.
And we know what stables are full of.
With four horses in my pasture, I don't need any more from the orange shitgibbon.
What horses produce serves a purpose, unlike Trumplethinskin.
He's off by a lot.
"Though Nevada is a desert, it was once entirely submerged hundreds of millions of years ago. The state experienced everything from warm, shallow seas to deep ocean basins. Reefs were common, and evidence of their existence can still be found today in fossils. Animals such as the ichthyosaur once swam in the waters that covered the state, as did ancient plankton and fish."
https://nevadamagazine.com/issue/january-february-2017/4103/
You alluded to it already - the salon probably already has serviced someone trans. But that doesn't matter. Nor does this specific case matter, it's just the first drops before the dam breaks. The wider fundamental religious ideology has found a new toy designed on the dais of SCOTUS and delivered by the milquetoast media to allow people with low self control to be assholes in public cloaked in religious finery. When your government is actively finding ways to bring about suffering for select people, is that a government for the people, by the people? Should it exist in the framework of our Constitution at all?
ಠ_ಠ
It is even possible that she has a long-term repeat client who is trans.
These bigots do not want true freedom. They only want freedom for their hateful ideology, and repression for anything else.
It is a paradox and they don't even know how to spell it.
🤣🤣🤣
Say "paradox" to them and they'll think you're talking about Casey and Kildare ... and YES, I'm an old fart to remember those two!
I'm old enough to remember Dr. Kildare actually singing his show's theme song...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAOX6nv0Br8
Oh, and by the way, Chamberlain was once romantically involved with fellow actor Wesley Eure (Will Marshall from "Land of the Lost")
DM is older than you, not sure for Troyblesh00ter), I am not sure she would understand what you are talking about.
American television back in the day. You and she wouldn't understand. :)
Geesh. I'm really old. I thought "Lew Ayres and Lionel Barrymore," though I am fully aware of Chamberlain's more recent (though even that is old) portrayal. Vince Edwards passed in '96, but Chamberlain is still around.
"When two minks fall in love..."
"A paradox may be paradoctored."
Robert A. Heinlein: All you Zombies. One of the Bye-laws of Time.
If you haven't read it - Where have you been?
Mars?
Quack. Quack.
(Pair of ducks. I'll show myself out.)
As I've said many times…
The Supreme Court notwithstanding, finding exceptions to laws of general applicability which forbid discrimination simply underlines why we have those laws to begin with.
Any person in any service industry, whether wedding photography, website design, or hairdressing should understand that the only face a client should ever see is pleasant, interested, concerned, and polite. Back in my working days, I made a lot of money because of the other photographers who didn't understand this simple fact.
She has decided that her tribal politics are more important than her customer relations. She has FA'd. May she find out, and soon.
FA'd means ?
(Fa!) far, a long, long way to run
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OuPHFhZbr4U
The entire expression is "fuck around and find out"
Fucked around.
OT: Iowa legislature passes 6 week abortion ban, governor to sign bill at a FamilyLeader event on Friday.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/iowa-lawmakers-hold-special-session-pass-6-week/story?id=101082504
I spoke in the Senate subcommittee. It was..... interesting. 😉
https://twitter.com/Rushthewriter/status/1678830123930251280
Sometimes you just got to call a spade a spade ... even if the spade don't like it.
Funny thing, they had no problem being referred to as Nazis. Frightening.
Next time, if you want to get a rise out of them, call them "Jesus-hatin' Nazis."
Or even, Jesus-hatin' kristains.
Bigots hate being called bigots.
Calling bigots bigots is the real bigotry, dont'cha know?
Yeah ... I noticed that, too ... 😝
If you are LittleDevilsA nice T-shirt.
Thanks! After speaking regarding the voucher bill in a House subcommittee back in January, the famous Raygun folks reached out to ask if they could make shirts. Of course! Huge flattery! I sent them the artwork. I believe I made it in Paint in like 2 minutes. It's deliberately bad....and the best I can do.😉
"She added that anyone who uses personal pronouns wouldn’t be welcome either."
I doubt it's possible to hold an intelligent conversation on any subject without using personal pronouns. The fact that so may conservatives/christians can't seem to understand that is difficult to fathom. Do they not get the concept of what pronouns are, or what? It's tempting to put this down as one more failure of America's education system, like their ignorance of science, the Constitution and a host of other things, but I daresay this is more like WILLFUL ignorance. They claim to have free will, after all; it's not much of a stretch to assume their near-total ignorance must be a product of their will.
"If a human identifies as anything other than a man/woman..."
Honeybun, trans people DO identify as men and women, because that's exactly what they are. Get it?
"This is a free country and I am not a slave to any narrative." Except the narrative in a 3000-year old collection of preposterous stories, of course.
As for your damnfool nonsense about how your kind used to just let LGBT people alone to be ourselves, yes, absolutely--you left us alone to live in constant feat of arrest, assault, unemployment, imprisonment, castration, electroshock, losing our families, and whatever other foul rewards you felt like dishing out to us. The days when people like you were free to treat us any way you chose are long gone, and if you think we'll go compliantly back to living that kind of life, you damn well better REthink.
Just like yesterday's sociopathic ammosexual.
I missed that. I must be living in God's grace or something.
He claims to be an atheist, but parrots variations of religious “good old days” points.
Beat me to it by "just now" – it could be that there are languages without personal pronouns, but it's difficult to get around in English without them.
I am not sure it's possible for a culture who use a spoken language even if they would function like a hive (the Borgs). We/you, at least, would be necessary.
Pratchett's Auditors come to mind.
https://discworld.fandom.com/wiki/Auditors_of_Reality
Forgot about them, my favorites in Discworld are "The watch" and "the witches" books.
"H.E.R. walks into a hair salon..."
Love how kkkonservatives whine that they've "had enough."
Funny. We feel the same way about YOU, kkkonservatives.
Well, they 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 had enough. They've had 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 than enough. They've had nearly everything, and balked at being asked to give up even the tiniest slivers so that anyone else could have anything at all.
Equality is a nasty word to them. They just follow the lead of their gawd. Soon they will start burning people. THAT is their standard practice.
Yeah Rayen was complaining about that yesterday. Minorities had had enough and ze was lamenting that we had spoiled zir perfect world.
It's the whole "When you're accustomed to privilege, equality can seem like persecution" thing.
Ms. Geiger:
Hate can't be prettied up with a haircut.
Bet Geiger has no issues providing service to customers who are either on their second or third marriages or cheating on their spouses. Then it's "Don't ask, don't tell."
Must be tough for her to carry a double standard into battle.
I had a conversation with someone who said a previous marriage or having a kid isn't something that you wouldn't know unless they told you about it, while being a homosexual couple is obvious and they're in your face about it as part of the homosexual agenda.
https://front.moveon.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/gay-agenda-full.jpeg
As many times as I've seen that, I still say it's missing a spoiled little dog.
no brunch? Fake gays
The horror. The....horror......
My eyes! My eyes! 😉
I'm guessing the homophobe assumes all gay men are effeminate and all gay women are butch.
I'm betting said homophobe has never seen the inside of a leather bar or its clientele.
Or Dan Savage.
Or all "butch" are lesbians. If I cut my hair I would look like one. I am not even bi curious.
Then, being a heterosexual couple is obvious and they're in your face about it as part of the heterosexual agenda.
All those hideous golden-domed houses of jeezyboy's hatred are not making a statement about their satan spawn jesus with its stone age superstitions and ignorance?
Which has absolutely no bearing on serving an individual who comes into your hair salon for a haircut.
I swear to God, they don't even bother to 𝑓𝑎𝑘𝑒 reason well.
I don't understand why she even does women's hair. The bible clearly states that women
1 Corinthians 11:6 "For if a woman does not cover her head, she might as well have her hair cut off; but if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should cover her head."
and "Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, 15 but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering. 16 If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God.
So women must cover their head and must not cut their hair.
The anti Jewish men stance doesn't show at all.
Christians have strong fingers, hands and wrists. It's from all that cherry-picking they do.
Which is weird, since from what I know they can only go cherry picking after they get married.
Um... look at her hair in that picture. I'd rather go to a poodle groomer, they have skills.
Fun fact: Cesar Millan's* first job in the US was as a dog groomer.
* aka the Dog Whisperer
My very first job was with a veterinarian who assigned me "pet bather, dog groomer" position. I got pretty good at it. Came in handy later on, giving all my punk rock buddies "creative" hair styles, including mohawks. :D
But poodles were the most fun to trim. I'd do all kinds of funny things before finalizing the cut.
I would have loved to see how you wrestle a dog (28 kg with a innate knowledge of inertia) who hate being wet into bathing. For once, Aria was the more reasonable of the two and could be convinced to go in the bathroom without too much fuss.
Barberbarian.
That's a mean stutter you got there, dude! 😁
Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Barbara Ann
♫♪ Take my haaaaaaand... ♪♫
You got me rockin' and a-rollin', rockin' and a-reelin' Barbara Ann Ba-Ba-Ba- Barbara Ann...
😁
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nIv_9NAjZLA
Palate Cleanser:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWwBNSP5B34
https://youtu.be/o7pP8eGIqII
It's a shame this show only got one season:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK_ZQalOLfI&pp=ygUXYmFyYmFyaWFuIGFuZCB0aGUgdHJvbGw%3D
The full first episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uf-RS7Y8HdE
Why do they refer to a tv series utilizing Muppet-style puppets as "animated?" :)
Ever notice how Muppet-types always played stringed musical instruments left-handed? All of them,
🤔 No.
Ooh, very good. :)
As Clarence Thomas said, "While I did not except our ruling on the free speech and the religious rights would be used to oppress minority communities and no one could have foreseen us saying that it is ok, would result in people thinking that it was ok. But now that it has happened, I fully support it. And it has not gone far enough."
As John Roberts said as he stuck his fingers in his ears., "Our ruling won't cause persecution of minority groups. NANANANANANA I CAN"T HEAR YOU!!!"
As Brett Kavanaugh said, "This just proves that white male men are the actual victims here. Also if one were to butt chug a bud lite, hypothetically, does that make that supreme court justice gay? Just asking for a friend. Hypothetically."
I'm waiting for SCOTUS to revisit Loving v. West Virginia.
With Clarence Thomas grandfathered in of course. Unless he wants a divorce.
What are you talking about Clarence is white. I can prove it. Does he have a poor understand of other people's problems, and then demands that other people share his ill-convinced notions? Has he ever abused a position of power and then got offended that someone would point it out? Does he demand two sets of rules of ethics, one for him and one for you? Does he have a golf club membership? Do black women make him uncomfortable? He is as white as snow.
Uncle Thomas is what people call an Oreo. :)