Houston, you have a problem (sorry, it had to be done).
Gayz and lesbianz are obviously two different things. Gays are repeating Onan' sin by wasting their semen while two women kissing are waiting for a man to show them the right path, there is no such thing as lesbianz.
Exactly, there are no such things as lesbainz. That's why Houston was searching for those images so he could down load them from the internet and remove them. He didn't want the lies of Lesbains to spread.
I logged in around 6:34AM my time this morning and spent a few minutes catching up on yesterday's article before coming here. It's currently 7:15AM. :)
For a religion that is so heavily opposed to sex (especially same-sex relations), they sure are fascinated by it and can't seem to get their fill.
I've said it before: the bible belt is the biggest consumer of porn in the USA. Gay porn, in particular. Houston is just another Elmer Gantry who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.
This isn't even porn. 'Women kissing' would be a socially acceptable front of an AARP pamphlet. And as search terms go, the only thing I can think of when I read his is 'how quaint.' 16-year-old ericc who had had to browse dead tree magazines is laughing at his lack of search term sophistication. This is not even 'jugs' level of competency.
But yeah, there is irony to be found in the fact that while he can find such images anywhere (not just porn), his own organization would probably like to make such imagery illegal to show in public.
So I never watched "The Simpsons" and went looking. There is, for whatever it might be worth, a Snopes page on that. I honestly don't know if I should be horrified, laugh, or cry here.
Years ago I became aware of a company that sold very large inflatable balls. 4 feet or more in diameter. Seemed like something my little kids would like. One day at work I googled the company name: Big ‘Uns. And then I ran down the hall to my manager’s office to explain because what came up was NSFW.
ETA: I may have googled “Big ‘Uns Inflatable Balls” come to think of it.
UK Statutory Instruments2013 No. 1616PART 6Rule 34
Record of the inquest
34. A coroner or in the case of an inquest heard with a jury, the jury, must make a determination and any findings required under section 10 using Form 2.
I'm not on Twitter / X (and quite glad of that, thankuverymuch!), but if I were and I put something out as a tweet, I'd like to think that I'd be posting things that 1) had a degree of value to my audience and 2) was NOT something I'd ever consider deleting, whether "they have served their purpose" or not. That Houston posts something that is at least odd of not potentially salacious, then claims a hack and/or deletes said post is at least suspicious if not seriously problematic.
Oh, but he's a CHRISTIAN, so it really is all okay ... IN A PIG'S EYE!
If it's him, then he thought he was typing in a search engine, not typing in X. Either way (him or not him), this was obviously not something Houston thought was post-worthy.
I have long suspected the big time preachers of being the worst kind of cynical atheists. There is simply no way they would want to stand before their maker and justify the lives they've led. There are few groups I trust less to tell the truth about anything. Their enablers in the pews are just as bad or they wouldn't be there delegating their thinking to the clergy.
Exactly! They are so confident in their sinning (which is all done in the name of JEEESUS), because they know their God will forgive them their "oopsies".
The Falwell "pool boy" was taken to an evangelist orgy, I mean convention. His eyewitness account concluded that they're all just performers, as their behavior at this meet up was most hypocritical. Drinkin' fuckin' gropin' hypocrites!
I'd say a drag queen caught looking for porn involving little girls (or boys) is likely to end up with a stiletto heel between the eyes before the police are called.
Reading through this, I have no doubt that most of the Hillsong people believe Houston, even if very few people outside his group do. It's funny how the old chestnut about 'where there's smoke there's fire' never seems to apply to Christian leadership.
I think Shakespeare was right, though; Houston really does protest entirely too much.
“Houston doesn’t think it’s okay to act on one’s homosexuality. Unless, I guess, you’re a lady or girl and want to kiss another lady or girl… in which case Houston is not only okay with it, he wants to watch.“
The thing is, to certain men, ladies and girls kissing isn’t LGBT, it is entertainment for men and if it is for men it’s okay. Just like lying for Jesus is good.
It's both okay (for them to watch) AND not okay (for the girls to do). This is the old double standard. "I want girls to have sex with (for) me...if they do, society will congratulate me and call them whores," but the millennial version. Come to think of it, "even when they don't have sex with (for) me, I'll still consider them whores" is also part of both versions.
Look, if someone were going to hack a hate preacher's Ex-Twitter account, I have to believe they'd be a little more creative than 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵. Make him like and follow a bunch of stuff that would 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘺 ruin his career as a right-wing blowhard: abortion clinics, wind turbine manufacturers, drag shows, and vegan restaurants!
Well #1 I think is cultural. The obsession with lesbians has been pretty stable American culture for a few decades now, but I don't think it extends much farther than that.
#2 is not limited to this. Heck, 'desire to watch sex' probably isn't even limited to humans. In pretty much any social animal, it pays dividends to know who is shacking up with who.
When I was growing up in Greenwich Village 50 years ago, the LGBTQ communit was moving in.
The gays would emerge from their new bars and go onto the abandoned piers and docks to get frisky.
The 12-year-old boys would go down to the very same docks, find places to hide and watch the action. "That's disgusting! Let me see..." was their mantra. But they weren't f*****s, of course.
Nobody ever explained to me what this was all about, and I still don't understand. If you're straight, then ask a girl out. If you're gay, ask a guy out. It's that simple.
Well, as I said I think the 'understand' is that many social mammals have an instinct to pay attention to hookups, relationships, etc. in the tribe, herd, whatever. We see that in lots of species. Humans aren't that different, we have an instinct to pay attention too. It's just that in modern society our brain's 'important tribal interaction going on, pay attention' instinct gets fooled by the overwhelming presence of tv, lots of strangers, etc. We are drawn to obsession on the sex lives of strangers and even fictional characters due to an instinct evolved when we were living in groups of maybe 20-2000 - when 'who was hooking up with who' was REALLY important info for survival and prosperity.
Houston, you have a problem (sorry, it had to be done).
Gayz and lesbianz are obviously two different things. Gays are repeating Onan' sin by wasting their semen while two women kissing are waiting for a man to show them the right path, there is no such thing as lesbianz.
Exactly, there are no such things as lesbainz. That's why Houston was searching for those images so he could down load them from the internet and remove them. He didn't want the lies of Lesbains to spread.
Just getting to this article. You beat me to it by almost 50 minutes as of this typing.
Next time, you should log in at 9 am 😋
Don't you mean 6 am?
Yeah, I subtracted 6 hours instead of nine 😅
I logged in around 6:34AM my time this morning and spent a few minutes catching up on yesterday's article before coming here. It's currently 7:15AM. :)
See my answer to Zorg, I mixed your respective times.
Lezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz-byans.
If you don't spell things properly people won't know what you're talking about.
Like this ?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ua2k52n_Bvw&pp=ygUUSSBwdXQgYSBzcGVsbCBvbiB5b3U%3D
Just like that, except not so happy.
Always a classic.
ha.
For a religion that is so heavily opposed to sex (especially same-sex relations), they sure are fascinated by it and can't seem to get their fill.
I've said it before: the bible belt is the biggest consumer of porn in the USA. Gay porn, in particular. Houston is just another Elmer Gantry who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.
You're not being fair or accurate here.
He got caught with his hand down the cookie jar's pants.
Where the really good stuff is.
Well, I do live in the South ...
Condolences. ;)
So, you do your best to contribute to it? ;)
Donrox has the situation well in hand. :D
Are you suggesting he shaves his palms?
Bet he's had a bout or two of carpal tunnel syndrome. Or repetitive motion stress.
That's a myth, it's your back that steals the hair off your head.
Well, I do live alone ...
This isn't even porn. 'Women kissing' would be a socially acceptable front of an AARP pamphlet. And as search terms go, the only thing I can think of when I read his is 'how quaint.' 16-year-old ericc who had had to browse dead tree magazines is laughing at his lack of search term sophistication. This is not even 'jugs' level of competency.
But yeah, there is irony to be found in the fact that while he can find such images anywhere (not just porn), his own organization would probably like to make such imagery illegal to show in public.
As far as these kristers are concerned, a picture of two women kissing is porn.
Yup.
This is the religion that sees porn in classical art and sculpture.
That's why many statues today feature aftermarket fig leaves!
In "The Simpsons," they put low-rise jeans on David.
So I never watched "The Simpsons" and went looking. There is, for whatever it might be worth, a Snopes page on that. I honestly don't know if I should be horrified, laugh, or cry here.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/simpsons-predict-david-censors/
And also, very, very hot!
Years ago I became aware of a company that sold very large inflatable balls. 4 feet or more in diameter. Seemed like something my little kids would like. One day at work I googled the company name: Big ‘Uns. And then I ran down the hall to my manager’s office to explain because what came up was NSFW.
ETA: I may have googled “Big ‘Uns Inflatable Balls” come to think of it.
And a hotbed for prostitution from one of Taylor Austin Dye song.
Name one evangelist who isn't a performance artist putting on an act. It's their job. "Cheeses. Cheeses. Cheeses." --Billy Graham
"When Christ hung, and bled, and died, it was God saying to the world, 'I love you.'" --Actual Billy Graham quote
And just why was Billy Graham checking out jeebus's package? 🤔
He secretly wanted to be a nun.
“Ladies…kissing.”
Ladies? When your porn preference is Anne Elliot and Elizabeth Bennet going at it while Darcy and Wentworth are left out in the cold.
The jokes on this one write themselves.
I'm not even going to look but I bet it's out there, somewhere.
Good 'ol Rule 34.
Rule 34?
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1616/article/34/made
The Coroners (Inquests) Rules 2013
UK Statutory Instruments2013 No. 1616PART 6Rule 34
Record of the inquest
34. A coroner or in the case of an inquest heard with a jury, the jury, must make a determination and any findings required under section 10 using Form 2.
I'm not on Twitter / X (and quite glad of that, thankuverymuch!), but if I were and I put something out as a tweet, I'd like to think that I'd be posting things that 1) had a degree of value to my audience and 2) was NOT something I'd ever consider deleting, whether "they have served their purpose" or not. That Houston posts something that is at least odd of not potentially salacious, then claims a hack and/or deletes said post is at least suspicious if not seriously problematic.
Oh, but he's a CHRISTIAN, so it really is all okay ... IN A PIG'S EYE!
If it's him, then he thought he was typing in a search engine, not typing in X. Either way (him or not him), this was obviously not something Houston thought was post-worthy.
I have long suspected the big time preachers of being the worst kind of cynical atheists. There is simply no way they would want to stand before their maker and justify the lives they've led. There are few groups I trust less to tell the truth about anything. Their enablers in the pews are just as bad or they wouldn't be there delegating their thinking to the clergy.
B b but, they are forgiven. 🙏😇
Exactly! They are so confident in their sinning (which is all done in the name of JEEESUS), because they know their God will forgive them their "oopsies".
Karma may not, as this article proves. ;D
It needs to be hammered into them that "Get Out of Jail FREE" cards are just found in board games meant for entertainment purposes only.
Let's not, I'm kind of enjoying this!
The Falwell "pool boy" was taken to an evangelist orgy, I mean convention. His eyewitness account concluded that they're all just performers, as their behavior at this meet up was most hypocritical. Drinkin' fuckin' gropin' hypocrites!
I'm beyond sick of the people who hide their hypocrisy behind their clerical collars and bibles.
You and me both, brother. People need to learn that preachers shouldn't get automatic trust because they're "men of gawd."
It's not hypocrisy, it's studying their subject before lashing hell and fire on those who refuse to study with the good pastors.
There are plenty of hypocrites in the clergy. They present themselves as such paragons of virtue, while hiding all manner of sex crimes.
Looking for porn involving little girls?! 💫✨🌈Not a drag queen. Still not a drag queen🌈✨💫
I'd say a drag queen caught looking for porn involving little girls (or boys) is likely to end up with a stiletto heel between the eyes before the police are called.
Reading through this, I have no doubt that most of the Hillsong people believe Houston, even if very few people outside his group do. It's funny how the old chestnut about 'where there's smoke there's fire' never seems to apply to Christian leadership.
I think Shakespeare was right, though; Houston really does protest entirely too much.
“Houston doesn’t think it’s okay to act on one’s homosexuality. Unless, I guess, you’re a lady or girl and want to kiss another lady or girl… in which case Houston is not only okay with it, he wants to watch.“
The thing is, to certain men, ladies and girls kissing isn’t LGBT, it is entertainment for men and if it is for men it’s okay. Just like lying for Jesus is good.
The loudest voices against homosexual contact come from the deepest closets.
If I can't have it (you can if you just give yourself permission to be yourself), no one can.
I still say, in biblical times, that that was the patriarchs' favorite halftime show between doing their wives and/or concubines. 👁️👁️🤤
Hhmmm. Maybe it's a good concept. Need to find me some bisexual men.
It's both okay (for them to watch) AND not okay (for the girls to do). This is the old double standard. "I want girls to have sex with (for) me...if they do, society will congratulate me and call them whores," but the millennial version. Come to think of it, "even when they don't have sex with (for) me, I'll still consider them whores" is also part of both versions.
Pastor Brian is lyin’. The end.
He is hereafter dubbed "Lyin' Brian."
Better than Pastor disaster.
"I was hacked" is a pretty lame excuse. He should have went with "It was taken out of context".
He was hacked out of context.
Look, if someone were going to hack a hate preacher's Ex-Twitter account, I have to believe they'd be a little more creative than 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵. Make him like and follow a bunch of stuff that would 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘺 ruin his career as a right-wing blowhard: abortion clinics, wind turbine manufacturers, drag shows, and vegan restaurants!
Also, make him be a fan of Taylor Swift!
Well dang, now when I search on "ladies kissing girls" I don't get any lez pron, all I get is articles about pastor Brian Houston. Downer, man.
Christians ruin everything.
As I'm fond of saying, heterosexual men have three and only three reactions to hearing a woman is a lesbian, and they are, in this order:
1. That's disgusting!
2. Can I watch?
3. Both of the above.
Men who are unable to satisfy their women (or only when they get sex in a commercial transaction) often have this belief that
A. Lesbians know the great secret to "how to please a woman."
B. They are really bisexual nymphomaniacs who are just waiting for a "real man" to make up a threesome that can be written for "Penthouse Forum."
To A: Men should read women's books on sex and sexuality and learn from them instead of "Penthouse Forum."
To B: "Penthouse Forum" is fiction.
"Dear Penthouse...
I never thought this could happen to me..."
...But I went to a leopard eating faces party and the leopard ate my face!
LOLOLOLOL
LOLOLOLOLOL
Is Penthouse Forum still a thing? I was under the impression that the Internet killed dead tree porn.
https://external-preview.redd.it/Qr1szKYVpJAjGtdpZ7n9Kn6F22WHeT7T0Ntr5Zet_MU.jpg?auto=webp&s=b01a5823c4802a2a987e9a0db1eac88920363507
Now THAT's how you get wood.
No, that's how you get splinters.
Ouch!
Eeeeewwww. I shouldn't be so hard on you butt...
NSFW - https://penthousemagazine.us/letters/
Well #1 I think is cultural. The obsession with lesbians has been pretty stable American culture for a few decades now, but I don't think it extends much farther than that.
#2 is not limited to this. Heck, 'desire to watch sex' probably isn't even limited to humans. In pretty much any social animal, it pays dividends to know who is shacking up with who.
When I was growing up in Greenwich Village 50 years ago, the LGBTQ communit was moving in.
The gays would emerge from their new bars and go onto the abandoned piers and docks to get frisky.
The 12-year-old boys would go down to the very same docks, find places to hide and watch the action. "That's disgusting! Let me see..." was their mantra. But they weren't f*****s, of course.
Nobody ever explained to me what this was all about, and I still don't understand. If you're straight, then ask a girl out. If you're gay, ask a guy out. It's that simple.
Well, as I said I think the 'understand' is that many social mammals have an instinct to pay attention to hookups, relationships, etc. in the tribe, herd, whatever. We see that in lots of species. Humans aren't that different, we have an instinct to pay attention too. It's just that in modern society our brain's 'important tribal interaction going on, pay attention' instinct gets fooled by the overwhelming presence of tv, lots of strangers, etc. We are drawn to obsession on the sex lives of strangers and even fictional characters due to an instinct evolved when we were living in groups of maybe 20-2000 - when 'who was hooking up with who' was REALLY important info for survival and prosperity.
You're probably right there...it's one of the most fundamental human urges.
I'm sure Lesbos was a popular vacation spot for the 'preachers' back in the day.
“Does this guy also log into PornHub and type “boob”?”
Ah….maybe that has been my problem.
Yes you were searching for girls and women kissing but who cares?
Oh wait. You and your Evangelical yahoos care — at least you do when you’re claiming the moral high ground.
I care if the girls weren't yet 18.
It only counts when OTHERS do it. They call it "research" when they do it.