256 Comments
User's avatar
Joe King's avatar

"Either that’s brilliant trolling or an incredible plan for the future."

Both. It can be both.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

French lesson du jour "Les deux mon n'veu".

Expand full comment
Critical Pondering's avatar

I hope that the FFRF or a similar organization will contact the committee to let them know in advance that they will sue on behalf the Satanic Temple/Muslims/Jews/Fringe groups if Idaho attempts to block these groups from gaining access to the same funds, since it would (should) be very hard to make such a block stick legally. That would REALLY put a spoke in their wheel.

Edit: And can I add just how disgusting it is that they're balking the second they realize other religions would be benefiting? I mean, one, were they really stupid enough to not predict this in advance, and, two, can you make the Christian bigotry any more obvious than this?

Expand full comment
ericc's avatar

Yeah, it's crazy to think that, since >90% of the applicants for public funding would likely be Christian outfits anyway, what's got them upset enough to derail the legislation must be the thought of Christianity not receiving every literal dollar of public funding.

Expand full comment
CozmoTheMagician's avatar

The WHOLE POINT was to show off the xtian bigotry to make the bible humpers feel special. "see, we stopped those eeeebil satins from getting money!"

Expand full comment
Critical Pondering's avatar

It's true they might try to spin the story that way. Based on the article I get the impression they didn't foresee it, but maybe I'm wrong and they did. But... "See, we stopped those eeeebil satanists from getting money, but as a result you won't be getting the money we promised you either. Please re-elect me regardless." is not exactly a good look. Granted, they'll probably add something along the lines of "Woe us. The Satanists are trying to steal our money!" to make it more palatable for their crowd.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

Not their crowd, their (non sacred) cash cows.

Expand full comment
ericc's avatar

A lot of legislators foresaw it. Hemant's prior coverage going back months all has at least one of them pointing out "but what if the Satanists...." But, the fundies pushed forward with it nevertheless.

Worth pointing out there may be multiple different fundies in conflict here. It may be moving forward because the ones who want to eliminate Blaine regardless of satanists and heathens had enough power to force these meetings, with the hope that they'll get some of the "it's a bad idea if any nonChristians gets funding" fundies to change their vote to favor elimination.

Expand full comment
CozmoTheMagician's avatar

Your last two words describe religion in general IMO. Umm i think you edited your response... so i editing mine.. nvm..

Expand full comment
xenubarb's avatar

They live with christians. They go to church with christians. They're surrounded by christians, so that is where their world view comes from. Inside that bubble, "other" religions don't even deserve attention or recognition. They only realize they're not the "there can be only one" religion in their communities. Islam and Buddhists and Hindus, oh, my!

Expand full comment
Straw's avatar

The short answer is no. The long answer is also no.

Expand full comment
Jessie Effing-Devine's avatar

TST usually works with ACLU.

Expand full comment
RegularJoe's avatar

OT: I'm currently sitting in the Iowa Capitol waiting to testify in opposition to a bill being pushed by the Iowa Nazi Party (formerly GOP) that would eliminate gender identity from our Civil Rights statutes.

I'd rather be cooking, but I'm required here.

I hate Iowa Nazis.

Expand full comment
RegularJoe's avatar

Thanks for sharing that. I just got home...had to stop at the pub to decompress....very stressful, fighting for Rights.

I was there with one of my besties, a trans woman, and we both were able to share our perspectives.

It's a victory, to be sure, but as one of my Dem legislator buddies reminded me, nothing is safe until sine die. Still, I'll take the W and maintain my kit. 🙂

Edit: The trans woman in the article is Aime, one of my dearest friends. She's on her city council, and currently running for the Iowa legislature. She's good people. If you're so inclined, here's her website and ActBlue:

https://aimeforiowa.org/

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/electaime2024

Expand full comment
Joan the Dork's avatar

That was easily the most chilling bill yet. Not hard to see what the next step would've been after declaring trans people mentally ill by legislative fiat... the only reason I can think of would be to then use the power of the state to forcibly institutionalize and detransition people. Nightmare stuff- you all saved lives today.

...and I'm sure DeSeptic took one look at it from whatever Floridian hidey-hole he's nursing his wounded ego in and said "damn, why didn't I think of that?"

Expand full comment
RegularJoe's avatar

The TERF Nazi who testified¹ yesterday has a substack.

https://cynthiayockey.substack.com/p/the-darkest-secrets-of-the-transgender

(¹ Lied.)

Expand full comment
RegularJoe's avatar

I had a lovely conversation with the Nazi who proposed the bill after his trouncing:

https://youtu.be/cTxXFn8disM?si=gOVjeLa_-fHw06Sv

Expand full comment
oraxx's avatar

The people who continue to try and force religion into the public schools, paid for with everyone's tax dollars, tend not to recognize the rights of any religion but their own. Without intending to they demonstrate why the founders were very wise when the kept religion and government separate.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

I've had JWs come to my door several times since we moved here. I'm always polite and cordial, but when it comes to the bible or religion, I pull no punches.

Which is probably why they haven't been back in a while.

Expand full comment
oraxx's avatar

I will leave that to others. lol

Expand full comment
Guerillasurgeon's avatar

Some Australian comedians did it – it's on YouTube – I'll try to find it. They didn't get a great reception. Can't find it on a quick look, come back later maybe.

Still can't find it – but I do remember one old bloke hitting them with his walking stick.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

That's discrimination against theocracies !

Expand full comment
oraxx's avatar

Not seeing a downside to it. ;)

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

244 years ago, Benjamin Franklin rightly noted that any religion which could not support itself and whose god did not support it so that those religions cried out to the government for money to support it was a bad religion.

And since TST didn't exist at the time, it isn't hard to conceive which religion Franklin was referring to as bad.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

But, butt, but it's about grifters, not a traditional religion who relied on taxpayers money* for most of it's history.

* Money in a very broad sense like when catholic churches could claim 10% of crops.

Expand full comment
Old Man Shadow's avatar

What they want is to abandon funding public schools and brainwash the children into MAGA white Evangelicalism, so they can perpetuate their power and their hierarchies forever.

Because they tried to compete in the marketplace of ideas and have failed utterly because their ideas are awful and make people awful.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, fellas. If you want public funds to support Christian churches, you had better be prepared for similar funds to be permissible for Jewish synagogues, Islamic temples, and , yes, Satanic organizations. Oh, and if you want to omit that last because of some "compelling interest," know that such an assertion will be open to scrutiny.

Also, be aware: you don't get to ban something just because you don't like it.

Expand full comment
Bouchard's avatar

They really made it obvious that they intended this to solely benefit Christian schools.

Expand full comment
AlbertCamus's avatar

Fringe religious beliefs; like unborn children and virgin mothers?

Expand full comment
Karola Spring's avatar

Talking snakes, turning water into wine, raising the dead (necromancy), and so on. Christianity, and especially the Evangelical and Pentecostal sects, wholeheartedly embrace that the Bible is undisputed fact. At best the Bible is mythological or allegorical.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

Noted author Joyce Carol Oates, who graduated valedictorian, was lambasted by xtians for saying "The bible, as you call it, is a work of fiction; or rather, an anthology of fictions."

You know how the gullible get when you try to take their fantasies away.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

Is that recent? I saw a click-bait slide-show headline on that this morning but didn't click through to find out who the author was.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

Just seeing this. What Straw said.

Expand full comment
Straw's avatar

Earlier this month.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

Does this surprise anyone coming from a state where it is legal for parents to kill their kids, as long as, it is by denying them actual medical care and just hoping really hard that the illness will go away on its own?

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

The very Idaho that bans abortions, even in medical emergencies.

This is the state that gave birth to Aryan Nations.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

The thing that angers me is the Idaho legislature has been asked to repeal that horrendous, inhumane law and went "Nah, we like it."

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

But, but .... potatoes!

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

Always need salt.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

Pepper.

Except, not on fries.

Expand full comment
Len Koz's avatar

You don't like pepper on fries?

Next you'll tell me you don't like anchovies on pizza.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

I don't mind anchovies, but I wouldn't order them.

Expand full comment
Bagen Onuts's avatar

Solid salt?

Expand full comment
Straw's avatar

There is no excuse ever to put anchovies on anything at all if you try to make innocent people eat it. N E V E R.

Expand full comment
Len Koz's avatar

Do you know any innocent people?

Expand full comment
wreck's avatar

Po-TAH-toes!

Expand full comment
Bagen Onuts's avatar

To MAH toes cure Salmonelloa and other pathogens. See my earlier post.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

"But, but...potatoes!"

Now I gotta post this...

https://youtu.be/ad0w59lBfXU

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

Idaho? Feh! We here in Washington are the 2nd-largest producers of potatoes in the country,

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

Useless info of the day. The best potatoes I ever eat were produced locally in Cyprus.

Expand full comment
Guerillasurgeon's avatar

I grow some of my own. I was going to say I grow my own but I just don't have the room to keep myself supplied all year round.

Expand full comment
Len Koz's avatar

There's a Cyprus in France? I learn something new every day.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

Why not ? You can go to Paris without passport.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

I've been to France (and Italy, and Spain) without a passport.

Expand full comment
Kay-El's avatar

I can’t believe those legislators did not see the potential blowback for this, be it TST, FFRF or any other person or organization. I guess they were counting on god to foil the attempt. Maybe he’s too busy laughing. I know I am.

Expand full comment
Len Koz's avatar

I think some of them just forget that people other than Christians exist in their communities. They don't see them or interact with them and thus non-Christians aren't there in their minds.

I suffered from that in my youth. I was raised Catholic in New York. I thought most people were either Catholic or Jewish because that was who I interacted with. Then somewhere around turning 12 I found out that both groups are minorities in the USA. Imagine my surprise.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

We could very easily ignore the existence of religionistas if they'd stop trying to push their beliefs on unbelievers or encode their beliefs into law.

Expand full comment
Len Koz's avatar

That's probably why anybody who has interacted with the UU likes them.

Expand full comment
painedumonde's avatar

It's simply the way the system works - novices are in charge for a lot of the time. That or the writers are monumentally in the bag for God. Either way Not. Fit. For. Office.

Expand full comment
painedumonde's avatar

[squeals of joy] It's one of my [squeeee] favorite feelings to experience [squeee squeee]! The utter [sque] joy [sque] of [sque] watching a grown man drown in his own hubris! [SQUEEEEEEEE]

Seriously, the problem with any partisan movement or ideal is its blindspots. Especially in this nation. Our blindspots have, still do, and will continue to relegate minorities to disadvantageous positions and see them as second class citizens for the foreseeable future even while touting the nation's supposed enlightenment. Now don't get me wrong, America is a great nation in many ways, in fact the border "crisis" is a great illustrator - lots and lots of people see this country as a haven, an opportunity, and a place to improve their own lives where they are willing to risk DEATH to be here. But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm taking about getting more [squuuuuueeeeeees] So keep it up supposedly serious people of God, you are hilarious.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

Baisse d'un ton chéri, tu m'endolores les portugaises.

Expand full comment
Jessie Effing-Devine's avatar

The “strict scrutiny” rule? Good luck Idaho. If schools can’t keep a TST ASSC out without a new SCOTUS ruling, I have a hard time believing you are going to cut off funds to the TST for a school without a trip to SCOTUS.

Expand full comment
Michael Donahoe's avatar

Tax-payer money should not go to support any religious school or church. Yet, if it changes then all religions/spiritual organizations must receive the same support.

Expand full comment
Straw's avatar

I agree. In Norway we treat all religious community with money. The reason given back then, was that then the government could make the rules. It is not, for reasons that need a separate post, sustainable in the long run though. The JV doesn't get anything because they refuse members to have contact with relatives that have left the tyrannical organisation.

Expand full comment
ericc's avatar

Oh no, state rule-making for private schools is right out. What the US fundies are demanding is state tax funding for their schools combined with zero responsibility to meet state educational standards or requirements.

Expand full comment
Richard Wade's avatar

Another rough but sadly necessary lesson in empathy. GOP/right-wing Christians (The slash is because those two categories are now fully blended) are notorious for being sorely deficient in empathy, so sometimes proposing a hypothetical such as "How would you feel if you were forced to pay taxes to support a religion that you don't agree with?" still doesn't stimulate the meager vestiges of their empathic response. No, sometimes they have to be grabbed by the back of the neck and have their faces shoved into it: "This selfish, self-centered, self-serving Christo-chauvinist bill will let SATANISTS (gasps of horror from the audience) start a Satanic school to teach our children evil lib-ral values!"

Expand full comment
SPW's avatar

Ten to one they sit on this and then try to sneak it through with a few changes at the last legislative moment. I do love how the Satanic community has big plans to use the money. Stay on top of this story please.

Expand full comment