A barista says she was fired for her Christian faith. The facts are far more nuanced.

Paige Rogers’ own admissions undercut her Christian persecution narrative

This newsletter is free and goes out to over 24,000 subscribers, but it’s only able to sustain itself due to the support I receive from a small percentage of regular readers. Would you please consider becoming one of those supporters? You can subscribe via Patreon or the Subscribe button below! You can also make one-time donations through Venmo or PayPal.

---

A college student who worked as a barista says she was wrongly fired for bringing up her Christian beliefs to co-workers. And her right-wing allies are now jumping on the fact that only one side of the story can be heard.

Paige Rogers (screenshot via Instagram)

Paige Rogers, a 19-year-old student at the Southern Baptist Convention-affiliated Boyce College in Louisville, Kentucky, says she worked part-time at Heine Brothers’, a local coffee chain. She did it during her first year of college without incident. But then last October, a few weeks into the new semester and working out of a different store, she got into a conversation with two colleagues she’d never met prior to her shift.

They talked about college, which led to a conversation about Boyce, which led to a conversation about her fundamentalist Christian beliefs. One co-worker asked if that meant she was “waiting till marriage” (to have sex), to which Rogers said yes.

Later on, the second co-worker mentioned a passing interest in the Bible. Rogers saw that as an opening.

“I shared my own testimony with her. I shared how God had saved me and changed my life, and that it is God who changes your heart when you become saved,” she Christ-splained to her colleague.

That second co-worker apparently brought up how she’s in a polyamorous relationship and if being a Christian meant “she would have to stop loving her partners.” Rogers said yes. Homosexuality was a sin, she said, adding the usual meaningless caveat of how everyone’s a sinner.

(Keep in mind we don’t actually know what words she used. There’s a difference between “conservative Christians believe homosexuality is a sin much like greed and gluttony” and “I believe gay people will be tortured for all of eternity,” and we have no clue which one of those is closer to what Rogers said.)

Later on in the shift, after one of the co-workers went home, Rogers told the other person—it’s not clear which one—about how Christians will go to Heaven. It’s also not clear if this proselytizing was a mutual discussion or an unsolicited monologue. We don’t know what the other colleague was thinking. We don’t see the look on that person’s face having to listen to this tripe.

A couple of weeks later, Rogers received text messages from the coffee store’s management telling her she was being fired for violating the store’s policy on “workplace conduct and anti-discrimination.”

They said she “expressed religious beliefs in a manner that was unwelcome and offensive to others.” Backing up their statement, they said they confirmed this through internal security footage, and because she was within her first 60 days on the job (at least the way that kind of part-time employment was defined), they had every right to terminate her as an at-will employee.

Text messages included in the EEOC complaint (combined by me for ease of reading)

Rogers, as you can see from the texts, claimed she was just answering her colleagues’ questions and didn’t start the conversation. Though in her telling of the story, she openly admits going much further than just answering questions. (Also, someone asking if you’re waiting until marriage to have sex is not the same as someone asking questions about your “sexual life.”)

She went on to tell management that she told her colleagues she wasn’t “judging” them “or pushing my beliefs on them”… which sounds very much like what Christians tell themselves after preaching to others.

She also claimed they were discriminating against her because of her religion “and violating my first amendment right.”

And then she did what conservative Christians tend to do these days whenever they have to face the consequences of their own dumb actions: She went to a right-wing group that could amplify her story—in this case, First Liberty Institute. And much like failed essayist Samantha Fulnecky or fifth-place swimmer Riley Gaines, they found a perfect vessel to advance their fictional victimhood narrative.

First Liberty helped Rogers file a formal complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), now run by the Trump administration, before spreading the most advantageous version of the story:

“The idea that an employer can fire an employee for simply voicing a religious belief, after being invited to do so, is chilling,” said Cliff Martin, Senior Counsel for First Liberty Institute. “No employee should have to hide their faith in order to keep their job.”

In their telling of it, Rogers simply brought up her own faith in a discussion about religion, and that’s the only reason she was fired, and isn’t that crazy?!

They make no mention of a letter the company sent Rogers days after the text-message conversation in which they also brought up other reasons she was fired, including “concerns regarding communication, frequent call-ins, and limited availability that impacted scheduling needs.”

So it wasn’t just about her alleged religious bullying. It’s that she was a bad employee. (Those additional concerns were briefly mentioned in the letter to the EEOC, as seen above, but only to allege the company “changed” their official reasons for firing her.)

First Liberty didn’t just issue a press release either. They got their friends at Fox News to get in on the fun by giving them an “exclusive” story:

And a couple of days ago, Rogers repurposed that press release into a first-person piece for Fox News describing how she’s a victim:

It’s very dramatic.

… In November 2024, I took a job as a barista at Heine Brothers Coffee to support myself financially and help cover the financial strains that college can bring. It was a great job that fit well with my busy class schedule and assignments. Whether I was putting smiles on customers’ faces or having fun with coworkers, my shifts went by quickly, and I enjoyed the work. I would have never guessed how it would end.

…

I find this whole situation disheartening and frightening. I was never given the opportunity to share my side of the story, describe how the questions were asked, or explain how I simply shared my own personal beliefs. People might not agree with my religious beliefs, but alignment with my personal opinions is not the issue. The freedom for coworkers to voluntarily converse and share differing viewpoints without fear of termination is what’s at stake here.

…

… I was fired for responding to a question from a coworker. I was fired for my faith. Christians are called to speak the truth in love, and I firmly believe that is what I have done. I hope to encourage others going through a similar situation to stay firm in their faith and trust that God will do the rest.

…

No one should be fired for respectfully sharing their religious viewpoints — especially when asked.

It’s hard to believe she was fired for her faith when there’s absolutely no indication Heine Brothers’ Coffee has a No Christians Allowed policy. Based on what Rogers’ complaint says, it’s not hard to infer she was an unreliable employee who made her colleagues uncomfortable by judging their lives with her holier-than-thou attitude.

The lack of self-awareness here is astonishing. She says this was “a peaceful conversation between people who disagree,” yet her colleagues must have been the ones who complained to management. How badly did Rogers misread the room that she didn’t see how her preaching was affecting them? If they spoke to her about atheism or Islam the way she spoke to them about Christianity, what would her reaction have been?

If you ignore the useless bits in the Fox News pieces and the press release about how good of a Christian Rogers is—there are entire sections that include things like “Ever since Christ saved me, I now seek to love others as Christ first loved us”—this whole story is about nothing more than a company firing someone who was becoming more of a liability than an asset, and that employee lashing out to save her own ass.

Importantly, because this is now a legal issue, the coffee chain is unable to say anything else, which puts them at a disadvantage in the press. The Christian Right knows this, which is why they’re trying to shape the narrative before all the facts can actually come out. First Liberty even posted a photo of Rogers that they want everyone to use in their articles about her because how could you possibly fire this wholesome white Christian woman?

The way First Liberty makes it sound, there’s literally no way for any company to fire a Christian—especially one who publicly announces it while on the clock—without facing legal backlash even if there are plenty of secular justifications for it. And the fact that Rogers’ narrative has all this attention makes it harder for the coffee chain to defend itself no matter what the facts are. (Heine Brothers’ Coffee did not respond to my own request for comment.)

What we can say for certain is that this story of persecution is all too familiar by now. Someone who inserts herself into a co-worker’s personal life, says a polyamorous relationship is sinful, and talks about the afterlife isn’t just sharing her faith. When that predictably made everyone else uncomfortable, she reframed it as discrimination.

No wonder groups like First Liberty Institute are rushing to elevate this story before any full accounting of the facts can emerge. They know the power of the right-wing echo chamber. They know that, even if this case is eventually dismissed, it won’t matter if they can get the headlines they want right now. They know how gullible viewers will be if they can just get Rogers in front of friendly hosts to tell her polished, emotionally loaded version of events.

Skepticism isn’t just warranted here; it’s necessary. Look at who’s spreading her story: outlets that specialize in outrage-driven pro-Christian storytelling. You’re not getting a full picture; you’re getting one that’s curated by activists. You’re certainly not hearing from the colleagues who had to work with Rogers even though they may be in the best position to explain what they had to deal with. Without their side of the story, there’s no reason to automatically trust the one-sided narrative we’re getting.

---