....what the hell? Afaik the Catholic Church isn't even tied to Epstein. The Catholic League literally could've just said nothing. Bill Donohue just had to jump in to defend sexual predators because he felt like it, I guess? Love of the nonce-defending game?
In a way, it is all connected. It’s rich and powerful men who have been allowed to abuse people and get away with it. I do not doubt that folks will be reexamining the Catholic Church’s atrocities at this time. These PR messages are meant to be damage control.
First of all, WHY would Bill Donohue even WANT to defend Jeffrey Epstein in the first place? Was Epstein Catholic?!? Secondly, as Hemant points out, ANY sexual interaction with a minor, whether they're 7 years old or 17 years old (in numerous states) amounts to STATUTORY RAPE. (That's a felony, by the way, Billy-boy). Yet Bill and Company prate on as though they know what they're talking about, making assertions and narrowing word definitions to suit their hallucination.
Those girls were still raped, Bill. If you can't bring yourself to admit that, you should shut the fuck up.
At this point, I really need to see Bildo's search history. I keep waiting for the charges of child molestation/child porn to fly against him. Anyone who is this big a champion of molesters has to have his tentacles into the Dark Web.
No amount of using verbal acrobatics can justify the abuse that has been committed against a ton of children at any age or gender. Apparently the Catholic Church along with all other Christian denominations whether Protestant or Catholic don't know better.
And it's no wonder why churches are seeing empty pews now more than ever.
Jesus H Motherfucking Christ on a cracker. Billdo is a fucking lunatic. "It’s not pedophilia because the victims were over 10 years old." Bullshit. The semantic games don't cover the fact that the victims were 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯. "Besides, most of the perpetrators were gay." Again, the victims were 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯. What does the sexuality of the perpetrators have to do with anything? Even if thw victims could all legally consent, the unequal power dynamic still is coercive and thus it's still 𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲.
This is the core of it. And it's not just victims for whom conservatives fail to recognize basic humanity. It's everyone their warped hierarchy demands to be less than them. White men at the top, women are property of men, children are property of parents, and minorities are livestock, ar best. That is what they want, and that is what we are fighting against.
I wonder if Donohue has ever been engaged in a debate, whether his opponent were an atheist or not. I'd bet not, because at some level or other, Billy-boy knows that his bullshit and obfuscation don't hold water.
He wants an environment that AGREES WITH HIM and doesn't challenge his misbegotten beliefs.
I have relatives who downplayed the offenses of the pedophile adult male within our sphere because he only targeted the boys, not the girls. Of course, these re;atoves are also big tRump supporters.
Oooh, it's a bigotry fight. In the blue corner, their visceral hatred of gays. In the red corner, their misogyny which sees young men as agents and young women as property. Which will win their brain? Looks like red shorts today, folks.
I apologize in advance for grammar slips and typos, I slept 3 hours last night, and 1 this morning.
Let's play a game of what is not mentioned my maga cuntly and Little billy*
At no moment maga cuntly has a compassion for the victims, yet her daughter is 14 years old. I guess in her world it's ok if her daughter is assaulted or raped.
"Their argument here is that the accused priests weren’t technically pedophiles, but they were gay, and the Catholic Church opposes sexual activity between two men, therefore none of this is really their fault."
If they are gays, and the catholic church is antigay, why protect themand shifting them from parish to parish. Something doesn't add here. Even in 5D bretzel logic.
The argument itself is reprehensible, but isn't it also flawed? A 15-year old is not "post-pubescent" he or she is IN PUBERTY. Post-pubescent, I would think, is someone who is out of puberty. At that point, they are (most times) of legal age.
Biologically it typically happens anywhere between 12ish up to 16ish, with some outliers.
But it doesn't matter. "Who you raped" is a question for the priest's sentencing, it's not relevant to the question of whether a priest committed the crime of rape.
It's called both. But as Hemant says, we don't really know if those priests are gay by orientation or merely predatory and attacking any kid they have access to.
𝐻𝑜𝑤 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑠? 𝐿𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑓𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡.
Meaning: more than four percent, because if it had been less, they would've used a lower number.
This is already done, when we catch them. And frankly, it's not the RCC's job to be judge and jury, so really nobody is asking the RCC to weigh in on or concern themselves with sentencing decisions.
The RCC's moral and ethics problem is that they cover up the crime when the perpetrator is one of their priests. THAT is what needs to stop.
To me, the odd thing about this whole business is that 1) Epstein is NOT one of their priests and 2) I would just about bet a cup of coffee that Epstein was, at best, a LAPSED Catholic, if a Catholic at all!
Again, I have to ask: Why were Kelly and Donohue defending this ... (gad, coming up with a strong enough epithet is daunting!).
I suspect Kelly was attempting some sort of suck-up to Trump. I.e. minimizing the crime in case the files show Trump was involved. Which means she's like a week behind the news cycle. Trump seems confident there's nothing in there that will incriminate him, so now he wants to incriminate as many rich enemies as possible.
I predict that if or when something in there points to a Democrat, Kelly will be all over how horrible the crime was and how 15 is so unacceptably young. Just wait for the flip-flop, it'll be there. And the Catholic League will be there with her.
Donohue because any mention of pedophilia in the news triggers him to go on the defensive to protect holy mothe church, and Kelly because Trump is in the files and he can't be associated with raping children and maintain his god-king status among the faithful.
Well, Bill Donahue. Not the first thing that this homosexual who has never molested a kid ever wants to see in the morning. I’m much prefer a cup of coffee and Ryan Reynolds. Oh! The memories!
This is what they have been doing ever since the sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic church hit the big time. Deflect and deny and project. “If your religious morality leads you to parse the ages of underage victims in an effort to defend alleged predators, you’ve taken a wrong turn somewhere in life.” well, yes. Even given the multiple motivations underlying their desire to do this, it’s wrong. They’re not trying to defend the allege predators. They are trying to slime gay people with what their actual predators do. But then, this is what they’ve always done.
Here is the real question: why is a man who molest girls called a child molester or a sexual abuser, but not called a HETEROSEXUAL? and why is a man who molest boys is called a homosexual, but not called simply a child molester? Because that doesn’t fit in with their actual narrative.
The priests who are molesting kids are not calling themselves child molesters, they are invariably calling themselves heterosexual but celibate. The protestant youth pastors whom molest kids are not calling themselves anything but heterosexual. For decades, the Boy Scouts had a child abuse problem. They tried to blame that on gay men, but neither gay men nor gay scouts were allowed into the Boy Scouts. I worked for them 50 years ago, and the homophobia was palpable. But it wasn’t gay men who were doing the molesting. It was men who were known as heterosexual to the scouts, their communities, their churches, their families, and their wives.
Not to mention, themselves.
Of course the real reason it’s so many boys that are getting molested by priests is found in one simple word: ACCESS. They have greater access to boys than girls. I can imagine fathers everywhere are happy to say, “oh let father Bill take our three daughters out for a camping trip. That should be wonderful for them.”
no that isn’t going to happen
Another issue, which Hemant only alludes to, is that these grown men who have taken a vow of celibacy are molesting kids. They are fornicating. They are faithless. They don’t believe the product they’re selling. They are handling the holy Host in a state of unrepentant sin. They are lusting. They’re doing all kinds of shit. They’re trying to shift the blame to an innocent group of people.
Some of these child molesters may be same sex attracted. Some might even be termed homosexual within the usual meaning of the word. Not one would be considered gay in the usual meaning of the word. Every single one of them is corrupt, because what they are is what they claim to hate. Every single one of them is hypocritical at best. Every single one of them is at Best, in the most favorable light possible, sexually confused, faithless, and predatory.
But above all, every single one of them is a catholic priest.
So at the end of that Megan Kelly clip she claims that we haven’t had anyone come forward to say they were under ten or under 14 when they came under his (Epstein’s?) purview.
Here’s the deal though, we aren’t talking about Epstein’s preferences, he’s dead and cannot hurt children anymore. We are concerned about Trump’s relationship with Epstein and what was enabled inside that relationship. We absolutely have had victims come forward who were under 14 and even very close to 10 when they were harmed by Trump.
And what does “but he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby.” mean? How can they pass as even younger than the underaged child they are but also pass as legal? Look younger than legal but look legal? That don’t make no sense! Either they look really young or they look of legal age, dumbass. Besides 15 years old is still not legal, it’s not barely legal, it’s not a young woman, this is a child and off limits to creepy old men. And her other claim that wasn’t in the clip, that she’s not concerned with who he was manhandling 20 years ago, she wants him to keep boys out of locker rooms, yadda yadda yadda. Look shit for brains, Donald Trump has been credibly accused of raping more children than there are trans athletes in sports. Not only that, but these accusations fall into his first term, so less than ten years ago and the only reason he’s not still doing it is because we’ve caught on to him (possible also because his health is interfering but not likely). Teen girls deserve to finish childhood. They should not be forced into adulthood before they reach it naturally. As has been pointed out before, 35 year old men praising Hitler on social media are kids with potential, but 14 and 15 year old girls are adults that should put out to 50+ year old men and carry any resulting pregnancies to term. Fuck all these people with a flaming saguaro with a ghost pepper chaser.
I think it's more victim blaming. Saying Epstein liked girls who could pass for anywhere between 14 and 18.
It's bullflop, of course. He and Maxwell specifically recruited 14 and 15 year olds. They knew how old the girls were because they recruited them from Mar-a-Lago, which had employment records on them.
They didn’t go younger than 14 because they can’t legally employ them younger than that, so it would raise flags if they had 10year olds working in the spa. It was a calculated move, not an indication of their taste.
I know I should be more civilized but whenever I read about Bildo's latest escapade a fantasy involving me, a baseball bat, and Bildo's face plays in the back of my mind.
I don’t normally use this language, but fuck Megyn Kelly and fuck Bill Donohue.
Trump would if they were under age minors.
Oh, no thanks Lucas. I'd rather stick my junk in an anthill before that happens.
Oh, no thanks Lucas. I'd rather stick my junk in an anthill before that happens.
....what the hell? Afaik the Catholic Church isn't even tied to Epstein. The Catholic League literally could've just said nothing. Bill Donohue just had to jump in to defend sexual predators because he felt like it, I guess? Love of the nonce-defending game?
It's reflex at this point. Billdo's default position is to defend sexual predators.
Wouldn't you like to have a look at his browser history?
No. But a law enforcement agent with a strong stomach should.
you beat me to it!
In a way, it is all connected. It’s rich and powerful men who have been allowed to abuse people and get away with it. I do not doubt that folks will be reexamining the Catholic Church’s atrocities at this time. These PR messages are meant to be damage control.
Agreed. Trying to get ahead of the inevitable
First of all, WHY would Bill Donohue even WANT to defend Jeffrey Epstein in the first place? Was Epstein Catholic?!? Secondly, as Hemant points out, ANY sexual interaction with a minor, whether they're 7 years old or 17 years old (in numerous states) amounts to STATUTORY RAPE. (That's a felony, by the way, Billy-boy). Yet Bill and Company prate on as though they know what they're talking about, making assertions and narrowing word definitions to suit their hallucination.
Those girls were still raped, Bill. If you can't bring yourself to admit that, you should shut the fuck up.
As it was said for other predators' defenders, check his browser.
Yours truly would bet that Donohue's browser history is NOT for the faint of heart. The word, "nightmare" comes to mind!
You beat me to it!
Epstein was Jewish.
At this point, I really need to see Bildo's search history. I keep waiting for the charges of child molestation/child porn to fly against him. Anyone who is this big a champion of molesters has to have his tentacles into the Dark Web.
The phrase “Birds of a feather, come together” comes to mind!
No amount of using verbal acrobatics can justify the abuse that has been committed against a ton of children at any age or gender. Apparently the Catholic Church along with all other Christian denominations whether Protestant or Catholic don't know better.
And it's no wonder why churches are seeing empty pews now more than ever.
A bunch of sickos trying to justify sexually abusing children.
Cult members looking to get noticed by higher-ups in the Cult.
Jesus H Motherfucking Christ on a cracker. Billdo is a fucking lunatic. "It’s not pedophilia because the victims were over 10 years old." Bullshit. The semantic games don't cover the fact that the victims were 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯. "Besides, most of the perpetrators were gay." Again, the victims were 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯. What does the sexuality of the perpetrators have to do with anything? Even if thw victims could all legally consent, the unequal power dynamic still is coercive and thus it's still 𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲.
𝐼𝑡’𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑤ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑤𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑠𝑜 𝑤𝑎𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑐𝑎𝑛’𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑐 ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑠.
This is the core of it. And it's not just victims for whom conservatives fail to recognize basic humanity. It's everyone their warped hierarchy demands to be less than them. White men at the top, women are property of men, children are property of parents, and minorities are livestock, ar best. That is what they want, and that is what we are fighting against.
I wonder if Donohue has ever been engaged in a debate, whether his opponent were an atheist or not. I'd bet not, because at some level or other, Billy-boy knows that his bullshit and obfuscation don't hold water.
He wants an environment that AGREES WITH HIM and doesn't challenge his misbegotten beliefs.
Does Christopher Hitchens count?
https://youtu.be/MsbZqNR7HZs
Oh, BER-ROTHER! He went up against HITCH??? Oh, THAT just went into my watch queue! [big grin!!! 😁😁😁]
Bildo brought a rubber knife to a fight where his opponent was wielding a howitzer.
The age thing is the same bullshit argument Megyn Kelly used.
I have relatives who downplayed the offenses of the pedophile adult male within our sphere because he only targeted the boys, not the girls. Of course, these re;atoves are also big tRump supporters.
Oooh, it's a bigotry fight. In the blue corner, their visceral hatred of gays. In the red corner, their misogyny which sees young men as agents and young women as property. Which will win their brain? Looks like red shorts today, folks.
I apologize in advance for grammar slips and typos, I slept 3 hours last night, and 1 this morning.
Let's play a game of what is not mentioned my maga cuntly and Little billy*
At no moment maga cuntly has a compassion for the victims, yet her daughter is 14 years old. I guess in her world it's ok if her daughter is assaulted or raped.
"Their argument here is that the accused priests weren’t technically pedophiles, but they were gay, and the Catholic Church opposes sexual activity between two men, therefore none of this is really their fault."
If they are gays, and the catholic church is antigay, why protect themand shifting them from parish to parish. Something doesn't add here. Even in 5D bretzel logic.
* Petit billy, a French cheese with no taste.
"I guess in her world it's ok if her daughter is assaulted or raped."
After her daughter turns 15, it's okay as far as she is concerned.
"If she bleeds, she is fair game" by I don't remember who and won't bother to google it.
If you have to be pedantic about the word "pedophile", you've lost the argument.
The argument itself is reprehensible, but isn't it also flawed? A 15-year old is not "post-pubescent" he or she is IN PUBERTY. Post-pubescent, I would think, is someone who is out of puberty. At that point, they are (most times) of legal age.
Biologically it typically happens anywhere between 12ish up to 16ish, with some outliers.
But it doesn't matter. "Who you raped" is a question for the priest's sentencing, it's not relevant to the question of whether a priest committed the crime of rape.
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑥 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑤ℎ𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡, 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡’𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑎
It's called both. But as Hemant says, we don't really know if those priests are gay by orientation or merely predatory and attacking any kid they have access to.
𝐻𝑜𝑤 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑠? 𝐿𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑓𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡.
Meaning: more than four percent, because if it had been less, they would've used a lower number.
𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠𝑛’𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑘𝑎𝑦—𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑑
This is already done, when we catch them. And frankly, it's not the RCC's job to be judge and jury, so really nobody is asking the RCC to weigh in on or concern themselves with sentencing decisions.
The RCC's moral and ethics problem is that they cover up the crime when the perpetrator is one of their priests. THAT is what needs to stop.
To me, the odd thing about this whole business is that 1) Epstein is NOT one of their priests and 2) I would just about bet a cup of coffee that Epstein was, at best, a LAPSED Catholic, if a Catholic at all!
Again, I have to ask: Why were Kelly and Donohue defending this ... (gad, coming up with a strong enough epithet is daunting!).
I suspect Kelly was attempting some sort of suck-up to Trump. I.e. minimizing the crime in case the files show Trump was involved. Which means she's like a week behind the news cycle. Trump seems confident there's nothing in there that will incriminate him, so now he wants to incriminate as many rich enemies as possible.
I predict that if or when something in there points to a Democrat, Kelly will be all over how horrible the crime was and how 15 is so unacceptably young. Just wait for the flip-flop, it'll be there. And the Catholic League will be there with her.
Donohue because any mention of pedophilia in the news triggers him to go on the defensive to protect holy mothe church, and Kelly because Trump is in the files and he can't be associated with raping children and maintain his god-king status among the faithful.
In other words, they have no substantive reason, but they go ahead anyway because ... reasons! 🤪
Well, Bill Donahue. Not the first thing that this homosexual who has never molested a kid ever wants to see in the morning. I’m much prefer a cup of coffee and Ryan Reynolds. Oh! The memories!
This is what they have been doing ever since the sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic church hit the big time. Deflect and deny and project. “If your religious morality leads you to parse the ages of underage victims in an effort to defend alleged predators, you’ve taken a wrong turn somewhere in life.” well, yes. Even given the multiple motivations underlying their desire to do this, it’s wrong. They’re not trying to defend the allege predators. They are trying to slime gay people with what their actual predators do. But then, this is what they’ve always done.
Here is the real question: why is a man who molest girls called a child molester or a sexual abuser, but not called a HETEROSEXUAL? and why is a man who molest boys is called a homosexual, but not called simply a child molester? Because that doesn’t fit in with their actual narrative.
The priests who are molesting kids are not calling themselves child molesters, they are invariably calling themselves heterosexual but celibate. The protestant youth pastors whom molest kids are not calling themselves anything but heterosexual. For decades, the Boy Scouts had a child abuse problem. They tried to blame that on gay men, but neither gay men nor gay scouts were allowed into the Boy Scouts. I worked for them 50 years ago, and the homophobia was palpable. But it wasn’t gay men who were doing the molesting. It was men who were known as heterosexual to the scouts, their communities, their churches, their families, and their wives.
Not to mention, themselves.
Of course the real reason it’s so many boys that are getting molested by priests is found in one simple word: ACCESS. They have greater access to boys than girls. I can imagine fathers everywhere are happy to say, “oh let father Bill take our three daughters out for a camping trip. That should be wonderful for them.”
no that isn’t going to happen
Another issue, which Hemant only alludes to, is that these grown men who have taken a vow of celibacy are molesting kids. They are fornicating. They are faithless. They don’t believe the product they’re selling. They are handling the holy Host in a state of unrepentant sin. They are lusting. They’re doing all kinds of shit. They’re trying to shift the blame to an innocent group of people.
Some of these child molesters may be same sex attracted. Some might even be termed homosexual within the usual meaning of the word. Not one would be considered gay in the usual meaning of the word. Every single one of them is corrupt, because what they are is what they claim to hate. Every single one of them is hypocritical at best. Every single one of them is at Best, in the most favorable light possible, sexually confused, faithless, and predatory.
But above all, every single one of them is a catholic priest.
So at the end of that Megan Kelly clip she claims that we haven’t had anyone come forward to say they were under ten or under 14 when they came under his (Epstein’s?) purview.
Here’s the deal though, we aren’t talking about Epstein’s preferences, he’s dead and cannot hurt children anymore. We are concerned about Trump’s relationship with Epstein and what was enabled inside that relationship. We absolutely have had victims come forward who were under 14 and even very close to 10 when they were harmed by Trump.
And what does “but he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby.” mean? How can they pass as even younger than the underaged child they are but also pass as legal? Look younger than legal but look legal? That don’t make no sense! Either they look really young or they look of legal age, dumbass. Besides 15 years old is still not legal, it’s not barely legal, it’s not a young woman, this is a child and off limits to creepy old men. And her other claim that wasn’t in the clip, that she’s not concerned with who he was manhandling 20 years ago, she wants him to keep boys out of locker rooms, yadda yadda yadda. Look shit for brains, Donald Trump has been credibly accused of raping more children than there are trans athletes in sports. Not only that, but these accusations fall into his first term, so less than ten years ago and the only reason he’s not still doing it is because we’ve caught on to him (possible also because his health is interfering but not likely). Teen girls deserve to finish childhood. They should not be forced into adulthood before they reach it naturally. As has been pointed out before, 35 year old men praising Hitler on social media are kids with potential, but 14 and 15 year old girls are adults that should put out to 50+ year old men and carry any resulting pregnancies to term. Fuck all these people with a flaming saguaro with a ghost pepper chaser.
Rant.
𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 “𝑏𝑢𝑡 ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑏𝑦.” 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛?
I think it's more victim blaming. Saying Epstein liked girls who could pass for anywhere between 14 and 18.
It's bullflop, of course. He and Maxwell specifically recruited 14 and 15 year olds. They knew how old the girls were because they recruited them from Mar-a-Lago, which had employment records on them.
They didn’t go younger than 14 because they can’t legally employ them younger than that, so it would raise flags if they had 10year olds working in the spa. It was a calculated move, not an indication of their taste.
That picture of Bildo looks like what you'd get from a crappy AI if you prompted "a hamhock in a suit in front of a bookcase".
You’re not being fair here. A CREEPY ham hock in a suit.
I know I should be more civilized but whenever I read about Bildo's latest escapade a fantasy involving me, a baseball bat, and Bildo's face plays in the back of my mind.
Same here. I favor an ice pick through the eye and his prefrontal cortex stirred, NO shaken.