311 Comments
User's avatar
Troublesh00ter's avatar

How many times have we said it? If a school board plays favorites with religion and rejects one which is lesser known (The Satanic Temple) yet still recognized as a religion, they'll be taken to court, LOSE, and end up paying the legal fees and court costs. It's pretty clear that the Memphis-Shelby County Schools weren't listening when we told 'em, and now they're going to be out $15,000 that could have gone to school supplies or teachers' salaries or SOMETHING far more constructive. One can hope that the school board and faculty have learned something from this little contretemps.

OTHER school systems? They might take note, but I'm not sure I'd bet on it.

Expand full comment
Matri's avatar

Ha ha! You said “learned”!

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

Yeah, yeah, I know. Hope springs eternal and all that. Then, too:

𝑌𝑜𝑢 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑛. 𝑂𝑟 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑜𝑛'𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔.

-- Robert A. Heinlein, The Notebooks of Lazarus Long

Expand full comment
Zorginipsoundsor's avatar

In Lynn Flewelling's 𝘕𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘳 series it's, "Learn and live."

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

Too bad she stopped writing after this series.

Expand full comment
SeekingReason's avatar

😄

Expand full comment
oraxx's avatar

+++ They never learn.

Expand full comment
Alverant's avatar

I think they want a case to be taken to the SCOTUS who will decide the school can play favorites as long as the favored one is Christianity.

Expand full comment
Jim Sanders's avatar

“One can hope that the school board and faculty have learned something from this little contretemps.” Say what? Not a chance. Crazy zealots do not learn.

Expand full comment
Jason's avatar

The Satanic Temple is like a superhero-pirate that descends to punish the wicked wherever tales of Christian villainy are told. It swoops down, puts a $15,000 dent in the district's wallet, then flies off with the bounty, leaving believers dazed and confused. "What in the name o' sweet-ass Jesus was THAT?!"

Expand full comment
Fred Mertz's avatar

Unfortunately it’s the taxpayers who pay and those responsible aren’t held accountable.

Expand full comment
oraxx's avatar

It's high school level civics that our secular government cannot choose one religion over another, and public schools are a sub-division of government. Christian privilege is alive and well in today's America. These folks cannot seem to get past the idea rights are not matters of majority rule. Rights exist to protect the individual from the tyranny of the majority.

Expand full comment
Bagen Onuts's avatar

Their god is the biggest bigot in the universe.

Expand full comment
oraxx's avatar

Also the hide and seek champion of the universe.

Expand full comment
maddog7's avatar

i'm thinkin' hide & slack :-)

Expand full comment
Julie Duggan's avatar

He sure is......and so are his followers.

Expand full comment
Joe King's avatar

𝐸𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑐 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒, 𝑖𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑠, 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐶ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑦 𝑐𝑎𝑛’𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑙𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑑𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑏𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟 𝑟𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠.

They can't handle sharing, period. How much blood have they spilled over the centuries demonstrating this attitude?

Expand full comment
Bagen Onuts's avatar

"Holy Hatred" by James A. Haught. A bit dated, but a good history.

"Beyond the Crusades and and "Mostly Harmful" by Paulkovich are good for kkkatlik atrocities.

Expand full comment
Bill Wilson's avatar

Instead of blood, radical Christians spill their own capital on lost causes.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

They do both.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

"Just because the law is the law we don't have to accept it."

You actually do have to accept it, Calvo. New Testament scripture tells followers to obey all earthly laws and authorities. Did they not read that part in your bible study?

Expand full comment
Joe King's avatar

They only remember that one when the law allows them their unearned privilege.

Expand full comment
Jim Sanders's avatar

Bullshit. You do not have to accept the law if you are Trump and have SCROTUS watching your back

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

Trump was convicted of 34 felonies. He's still facing other legal issues. And while he was President, SCOTUS slapped him down (once unanimously over his contention that he could not be prosecuted for any crimes he committed while in office. Even his own picks refused to back him).

Expand full comment
Len Koz's avatar

They rely on the SCOTUS reading their bibbles.

Expand full comment
MikeinSonoma's avatar

I think they keep trying to violate the constitution, hoping that eventually one of these right wing judges will ignore the constitution and find in their favor. We’ve seen that happen at the federal level and in the Supreme Court.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

"It’s especially satisfying give how much resistance the administration put up against what should have been a simple request."

It's not satisfying. It's 15 000 $ wasted by the school board.

She later referred to The Satanic Temple and the After School Satan Club as the “enemy.”

It is but not in the way dhe implies.

"They had to know a judge or jury would never side with them."

Ahem....

(Can't sleep. Can someone help me with a two by four ?).

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

I could put you in touch with my college history professor. He'd almost certainly put you to sleep, despite your interest in history.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

I think I got his brother. Did he speaks in a monocorde, barely audible tune ?

Expand full comment
Len Koz's avatar

No, that's my BIL, the retired psychology professor. I understand there was a sigh of relief from the student body when he retired.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

He was not the most hated. There was one we had just before lunch. He always ended his classes by recounting the semester he did on gastronomy history where students had to bring specialities from their countries or régions of origin. Each lesson was actually a feast…

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

Tom Hiddleston is a gem, ain't he?

Expand full comment
Bagen Onuts's avatar

Missing the first frame which says atheists are going to hell.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

I'm disappointed that they intend to dissolve the club if the GNC dissolves. It validates the accusation of trolling. They should continue to meet as long as there is student interest, because this is supposed to be about offering the students the benefits of ASS, not an adult agenda.

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar
Jul 22Edited

It's not a matter of trolling, it's a matter of religious plurality, which is a highly held value of theirs. The Satanic Temple will not go into schools that don't have other religious clubs because a school that hosts only one religious group, even if that group is TST, would not constitute a religiously pluralistic scenario.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

Having only one club doesn’t invalidate plurality. Differences in access does. As long as the school prevents neither a GNC or ASS (or a Hindu, Jewish, Muslim) and treats them equally, it doesn’t matter how many there are.

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Plurality meaning more than one. It would invalidate plurality(at least from TST's perspective) if one religion and one religion only were occupying space in a public school.

You're free to personally disagree with that position, but that is the stance that TST takes on the matter and it is the reason they only offer clubs in schools that have other religious clubs. Not because they are trolling.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

Then there's the very likely scenario that the GNC club dissolves so ASS does too, only for GNC to re-form a couple of years later and ASS run into the problem that there is no longer parental support to re-form the club. It's much easier to continue than to start over.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

Plurality of access. It is trolling if the students are not the primary consideration. If you can provide value to the students *and* make the point, great. But if all you're doing is making a point then you're trolling.

Student clubs are about the students, or at least should be, not the adults' agenda, whether I agree with the agenda or not.

Expand full comment
Sheila Warner's avatar

I agree!

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

If Christians had been treated the way they treated TST, you could hear their holier-than-thou screaming in space.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

"...but given the backlash this group often inspires, I wouldn't want to put my family in danger by going public about signing up my kids for this either."

Something that has never been said about signing kids up for GNCs nor ever will be said about signing kids up for GNCs. Christians constantly attempt to bully/pressure/silence their competition to keep their chokehold on people, especially kids. It is clear that it's the "Religion of Love" that is the danger.

Glad to see their total capitulation in this instance. You don't back down from bullies. You fight them.

Expand full comment
Val Uptuous NotAgain's avatar

It is nice to see that this is a settlement, if the school district lost at trial they would be hell bent on appealing to SCOTUS just to get their way. With this settlement, it is done, kaput, over, finito, and that means they lose. The sad part is that the students of that district lose because their educators are too willfully ignorant to do the right thing. That includes the parents and other community members that fought, or threatened violence over this club.

Expand full comment
Hank Long's avatar

$15K? I guess the devil really does get his due! <snicker>

Expand full comment
Psittacus Ebrius's avatar

"The ST supports children to think for themselves". I have no doubt that the parents who oppose the after school club viewed this quote as an existential threat to the religious indoctrination of their children.

Expand full comment
Missael Silvestre's avatar

So we don't need to follow laws we don't like? Excellent! I won't follow any of your bible laws.

Expand full comment
RegularJoe's avatar

Bible "laws" aren't binding on those who aren't cosplayers of that particular mythology. 🙂

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

Yet.

Expand full comment
Straw's avatar

Good point.

Expand full comment
RegularJoe's avatar

That 2A applies to me as well. 😁

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

Watch how fast they enact gun control when they realize that just because liberals want to limit the availability of weapons of mass killing, doesn't mean they're unarmed or don't know how to hit the center mass.

Expand full comment
Bagen Onuts's avatar

Good point.

Expand full comment
Bill Wilson's avatar

Hail the first amendment.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

"A lawsuit against the district documented a clear trail of discrimination against Satanists."

Well, waddaya know? A real case of persecution in America. Only it's not Christians who were being persecuted. It was Satanists. The Christians on the school board were the ones doing the persecuting. Thus is it ever.

Expand full comment