338 Comments
User's avatar
Joe King's avatar

𝑊ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡, 𝑖𝑛 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 2025, 𝑠ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑤𝑒𝑟, 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑎𝑡ℎ, 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑠ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 $2,000 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠. 𝑆ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑖𝑑 𝑛𝑜.

Liar for Jesus lying? Check. Ninth commandment violation according to the strictest interpretation? Check. Mental gymnastics trying to justify the whole thing? Check. And all of it is to explicitly harm the people she hates, even after the courts told her to stop.

Gammarae's avatar

i note that mat staver did not comment upon this, but merely upon other things that supported his argument. are you a liar by omission, mat?

Len Koz's avatar

Does the Pope sh!t in the woods?

RegularJoe's avatar

Yep. Specifically the Ursine's Capirote woods

CLJohnson's avatar

What the fuck has Jesus got to do with this. Shove your religion up your ass.

IPHawk's avatar

Should sanction the lawyers and hold them responsible for half of the judgment.

Joe King's avatar

"Liberty" Counsel has deep pockets. Pay half? No, they should be fined an equal amount. Plaintiffs get double, Davis still faces consequences, and her lawyers find out about what the Establishment Clause means.

Matri's avatar

I’d rather her lawyers get disbarred.

Whitney's avatar

I don't see any reason Liberty Counsel can't make the full payment and the attorneys in question be disbarred. Not entirely sure this case reaches quite that level of seriousness, but if I were the judge, I would certainly consider it.

Val Uptuous NotAgain's avatar

Yoink her inheritance like she yoinked their marriage license. Fuck her and the entitled, self serving horse she rode in on.

Len's avatar
Jul 31Edited

Careful - horses are nice.

ETA: They have more integrity in one hoof than this “lady” has in all her bluster and moaning about how hard things are for her, not getting her inheritance.

Zizzer-Zazzer-Zuzz's avatar

I've had several bad horse experiences. Not their fault at all, but I'm going to keep avoiding them if I can.

Pamela Brightman's avatar

Oh Boo Woo! She brought it on herself and isn’t a victim.

Eric's avatar

I think she just likes the drama. I think it's clear she has a persecution complex, and this just helps feed it.

Matri's avatar

She’s Evangelical, of course she has a persecution complex.

Nancy Wells's avatar

Only way to be relevant!

Jennifer's avatar

Sooooo....morally bankrupt woman does morally bankrupt things? Who'd a thunk it???? But it's all ok...she's washed clean in the blood of jebus. I swear christians in the US are the best argument against christianity ever. I used to enjoy mocking their 'faith', but they've ruined it for me since there is no way I could mock it any worse than they do.

Bensnewlogin's avatar

Ya gotta hand it to her. The half-of-a woman has got ovaries.

But she does demonstrate clearly her commitment to the things that evangelicals appear to love the most: power, money, religious Dominion, and the major f.u to the law. Aside from disobeying Jesus, having affairs left and right and children out of some sort of wedlock, and ignoring the multiple Commandments in her holy Bible to obey the civil authorities instituted by God, she appears to be morally upright, or uptight.

She has inspired me to write another limerick. I was doing that a lot during the pandemic and contributing to sorryantivaxxer.com. My limericks there were legendary, even in my own mind.

There once was a Kristian named Kim

Who married, divorced on a whim.

She couldn’t be honest

Her land is the gonest.

SHe hated that He married Him.

Troublesh00ter's avatar

Not my best work, granted, but ...

𝐾𝑖𝑚 𝐷𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝑔𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑡.

𝑆ℎ𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑤 𝑠ℎ𝑒'𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑡.

𝑊𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑂𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑙𝑙

𝑆ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑡𝑜 ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙

𝐴𝑛𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑠ℎ𝑒'𝑠 𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑤𝑒𝑑 𝑠ℎ𝑒'𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑘𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑡.

Bensnewlogin's avatar

I actually think it’s pretty good. We should have a limerick contest. Everybody should participate.

larry parker's avatar

There once was a commenter named LP

Who refused to participate, you see

He thought limericks were dumb

Showed his disdain with a downward turned thumb

Then had to get up and go pee

Len's avatar

My apologies to whoever it was on here who penned the following (long long time ago) but I couldn’t resist:

There once was a haiku that stank.

Its meter was of second rank.

So I tossed in extra words,

And ceiling wax, string and curds,

And it wasn't a limerick either.

Troublesh00ter's avatar

Thanks! Much appreciated!

Len's avatar

Multi-lingual limericks 👍

Claudia's avatar

This is a great limerick!

And happy birthday-eve to you.

Bensnewlogin's avatar

Thank you. I plan on being 76 for at least a year.

Claudia's avatar

It’s Saturday now: Bonne Anniversaire - Herzlichen Glueckwunsch - Feliz Cumpleanos - Happy Birthday!

Hope you have a great day!

xx

oraxx's avatar

Kim Davis makes a compelling argument for atheism, and that the government should have moved sooner to remove the lead from paint. She appears to be a perfect storm of religion and right wing lunacy that has seems to have convinced her she should be free from consequences.

Troublesh00ter's avatar

I was tired of this lame excuse for a public servant about ... oh, hell, WAY past 10 squares back. That she continues to draw attention to herself and apparently wants to continue to play the wounded party only makes me want to see her face the consequences of her actions and her bigotry that much more. Let's put this bluntly: Kim Davis VIOLATED THE LAW.

And it is incumbent on her to pay for that.

Joe King's avatar

She hates the fact that the Public Apology to the Ceiling only makes the eternal consequences go away and not the real ones.

Len's avatar

Pretend eternal consequences.

Claudia's avatar

She's now in a bind. She has debts, sizeable debts and now she has got possible legal exposure of 'lying to the court' on top. The only way for her to get out of this is to play on her popularity/notoriety and hope that she'll get a podcast/bookdeal or something similar out of it. Nothing else is able to raise sufficient cash to get her out of that hole.

Troublesh00ter's avatar

To which I say, "TOUGH SHIT. You thought you could flout the legal system of this country. 𝗪𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗚."

Kay-El's avatar

Waiting for the MAGA version of GoFundMe who’s name escapes me at the moment

The Epistler's avatar

"STOP! You violated the law!"

How fitting that my t-shirt for today is the one with the Oblivion guard yelling STOP RIGHT THERE CRIMINAL SCUM!

Len's avatar

Talking about far too many christians, sadly. You should buy more of those t-shirts.

Joe King's avatar

𝑆𝑜 𝑠ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑠𝑛’𝑡 𝑎 ℎ𝑦𝑝𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒, 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑜𝑛𝑒; 𝑠ℎ𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑤𝑎𝑠𝑛’𝑡 𝑎 𝐶ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑦𝑒𝑡.

Them bagpipes sure are getting a workout.

Val Uptuous NotAgain's avatar

And yet she claimed to be a Christian before, just not a very observant one. Nonetheless, still a Christian. Just because she started going to church and maybe took a little bath, doesn’t mean that she wasn’t already living under the rules she purports to now hold dear.

She is trying to claim the King Whoeveritwas gambit, like everyone is putting on Trump. An imperfect person to spread the perfect word, type of thing. This is a serious case of Main Character syndrome.

Kathlyn's avatar

She’s as much King Cyrus as Trump is - that is to say NOT

Val Uptuous NotAgain's avatar

I know this, it’s just their fantasy of being their own personal Jesus despite being so corrupt. It’s an excuse to ignore their shortcomings while they create shortcomings in others and deny others basic humanity.

Len's avatar

Way back way back, it was kind of de rote to make your own personal testimony of how you came to Jesus as bad, black and damning as possible, to show how wonderfully wonderful he must be to save even you. More Jesus points must be good. Right?

Ethereal Fairy's avatar

Still is among the Charismatics, and Southern Evangelicals. I think they are all frustrated actors.

Len's avatar

This main character should have been written out after one episode.

Ethereal Fairy's avatar

Given the Ned Starke treatment.

Maltnothops's avatar

On an endless loop, it seems.

NOGODZ20's avatar

"What is hidden will be reveled."

Sound familiar, Kimmy? It should. Your Jesus said it in Mark 4:22 and Luke 8:17/12:2-3. He basically talked about how secrets, hidden truths and private actions will come out in the open sooner or later.

And what's with the attempted deception, anyway? Your god hates deceit.

Len Koz's avatar

Nuh uh! Lying for Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life!

Len's avatar

The way, the truth, and the lie.

Len's avatar

“Your god hates deceit.”

Hmm - kinda sorta. We* all thought Jesus was dead and gone, but it turns out he had just taken the weekend off and was resting - pining for the fjords**, so to speak. Maybe he went fishing. Or perhaps there was an ironman event that weekend - although we know he’s not so good with iron.

Perhaps we should more often emphasise the deceptive and altogether shady nature of he who should not be named. Especially about how he likes to pretend he couldn’t find Adam & Eve in his own garden. I think he just wanted to ogle them. Nasty god.

* Well, his mates anyway.

** Although, being omnipresent, he’s already there as well.

Joan the Dork's avatar

In a just world, we could have forgotten about this fool of a hypocrite a decade ago.

Then again, in a just world, we could've forgotten about a certain 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 fool of a hypocrite a decade ago, too.

If there's one talent that fools and hypocrites possess in spades, it's the unfailing ability to leave generational skìdmarks across society, often over the pettiest of things, long after everyone else is well and truly ready to be done with their shìt.

painedumonde's avatar

I'm not normally a "I must break you" guy, but doesn't prayer work here? And if not, isn't that just a test of faith? Just asking questions.

NOGODZ20's avatar

She needs bigger mustard seeds.

Joe King's avatar

Mountain moving doesn't pay like it used to.

Troublesh00ter's avatar

If you're going to go to the trouble, time-warp him back to early 1946, say a couple days just before Operation Crossroads. Be a nice surprise for him.

larry parker's avatar

Too nice. How about Bouvet Island.

wreck's avatar

North Sentinel Island.

larry parker's avatar

Thought about that, but could be dangerous for the Sentinese.

wreck's avatar

I see your point.

NOGODZ20's avatar

Going there can be 'arrowing for evangelicals. Or anyone else.

Maltnothops's avatar

At first g-lance I didn’t see the pun.

The Epistler's avatar

How about Monster Island? (Don't worry - it's just a name!). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPRXJ4XObMo

James Scammell's avatar

Another sign that the USA is seriously whacko !

How can such a woman find so many husbands ?

Did she bribe them ?

NOGODZ20's avatar

I gotta know why one of her hubbies married her twice.

Len Koz's avatar

He's a masochist.

XJC's avatar

She's hot white trash in Kentucky.

Die Anyway's avatar

She was good in bed?

The husbands were desperate losers?

She had a job and they didn't?

It's Kentucky?

Len's avatar

All of the ab…. OK - don’t want to know.

Charles Newman's avatar

"seriously whacko" IMO the USA is loosely a theocracy. With its protections and exemptions for religions. Sadly religions rule the United States.

Tax the fucken churches! Frank Zappa-1980 😆🤪

Maltnothops's avatar

I wonder if she has ever thought to herself “I sure wish I had just signed that damn marriage license.”

NOGODZ20's avatar

Anita Bryant's homophobia cost her her career and her first marriage before she finally died from cancer 2 years ago.

Len Koz's avatar

Anita did live long enough for her granddaughter to come out to her.

NOGODZ20's avatar

Yup. She married another woman, too. Did she invite her grandmother to the wedding and if she did, what was her nana's response.

Lynn Veit's avatar

This Enquiring Mind wants to know.

Lynn Veit's avatar

Talk about divine justice.

Psittacus Ebrius's avatar

Back in the late '70s, I can remember a video from a news conference she held. While spouting her anti-gay bigotry, a young gay man approached her and put a pie in her face. Even after that incident, I don't think she took the hint.

NOGODZ20's avatar

She didn't. Her immediate response was "Well, at least it was a fruit pie."

Stupid, Anita. Stupid.

XJC's avatar

How did God let that happen?

Joe King's avatar

Probably not. That would mean admitting that she was wrong, and I doubt that she has enough self-awareness for that.

Maltnothops's avatar

See I think she could avoid admitting that she was wrong. The notion that she should have signed the form could be motivated by simple greed. The inheritance she is about to lose. I’m guessing that if she had known then what she knows now, her ‘stand” for her principles never would have happened.

Len Koz's avatar

So she's in the "find out" phase?

Lynn Veit's avatar

I seem to remember she could have asked an assistant to do it? Something about how there were other people there who were legally allowed to sign it for her if she didn't want to, but she refused so she could grandstand her fanaticism and make it into a literal federal case?

I could be remembering wrong, it was so long ago.

Maltnothops's avatar

I have that same recollection.

jmax's avatar

If the Catholic Church can get away with hiding assets to avoid monetary judgments, why not her?