This newsletter is free and goes out to over 26,000 subscribers, but it’s only able to sustain itself due to the support I receive from a small percentage of regular readers. Would you please consider becoming one of those supporters? You can subscribe via Patreon or the Subscribe button below! You can also make one-time donations through Venmo, CashApp, or PayPal.
Let’s say it all together now: Christian bigot Kim Davis is back in the news.
That’s because the former Rowan County, Kentucky clerk who defied the law in 2015 when she refused to sign marriage licenses for same-sex couples, and who already had to pay $100,000 to one of the couples whose civil rights she blocked, and who was forced to pay that couple’s lawyers over $260,000 in legal fees, has been trying to hide from the courts how much money she has so that they can’t take it from her.
And now a federal judge is demanding she explain herself… or else.
For those of you who are lucky enough to forget she exists, let me remind you of Kim Davis’ inherent hypocrisy: opposing same-sex marriage while engaging in all kinds of straight shenanigans of her own.
This is a woman who, in chronological order, married Husband 1, had twins with Husband 3, divorced Husband 1, married Husband 2, divorced Husband 2, married Husband 3, divorced husband 3, and then remarried Husband 2.
(Just like Jesus wanted.)
How did she justify her personal life with the whole “sanctity of marriage” thing? Simple. “God still wasn’t in the picture” until Husband 2’s mother died, she wrote in her book, and they went back to church in 2011. So she wasn’t a hypocrite, everyone; she just wasn’t a Christian yet.
In fact, in that book, she chalked up the whole hypocrisy charge to “divine irony.” God took a woman married four times and used her to defend marriage against the gays. Isn’t that so mysterious of Him?!
But her legal history is what matters here. In 2022, a federal judge ruled that Davis broke the law when she refused to sign a legal marriage license for a gay couple on account of her bigoted Christian beliefs. She was a government worker and her personal beliefs, the judge said, couldn’t override the law she had sworn to uphold. When a jury heard the case in 2023 to assess damages, they didn’t buy any of the arguments offered by her attorneys at Liberty Counsel, a Christian hate group, so they eventually ruled that Davis owed David Ermold and David Moore $50,000 each. Liberty Counsel argued that Davis had qualified immunity and couldn’t be sued. The jury, on the other hand, was persuaded by the principle of fuck around and find out.
At the time, Liberty Counsel said they would appeal the decision… and, of course, that went nowhere because Kim Davis clearly broke the law. When it came to the legal fees she owed, the couple asked for “$246,026.40 in attorneys’ fees and $14,058.30 in expenses.” Davis’ team tried to whittle that down to a little over $100,000, but the judge didn’t buy any of the Davis team’s arguments. (Even if you don’t follow legal cases, his decision was a pleasure to read.)
Liberty Counsel kept appealing, all the way up to the Supreme Court, and they kept losing, which I’m sure they didn’t care about because she was great for fundraising. In any case, the additional litigation led a district court to award the couple’s side another $201,592.60 in attorneys’ fees.
If you do the math, that meant Davis owed Ermold/Moore and their lawyers $565,285.91.
But she hasn’t paid out a single dime yet because she insists she’s broke.
According to a lawsuit filed in July from the lawyers of Ermold and Moore, however, that was a lie.
Davis, they argued, inherited quite a bit of money and land when her mother died—her share was worth over $400,000—but she immediately transferred her half of the property to other members of her family so that the courts couldn’t take it away from her.
… Kim Davis and her brother Darold Rayburn Bailey Jr. transferred a Morehead home in their mother’s estate to Bailey Jr., his wife, and Kim Davis’ husband Joe Davis, effectively writing her off of the deed, according to court records. Then, in May 2025, Kim Davis and her brother transferred a 50-acre farm parcel and a separate three-bedroom home to a trust for which her husband and son are beneficiaries. The transfers were made for “the love and affection which the parties have for each other ... and for no monetary consideration whatsoever,” but their fair cash value would have exceeded $400,000, half of which belonged to Davis, the attorneys say.
What made that so damning was that, in late 2025, she had to answer, under oath, a question about whether she had transferred any property worth more than $2,000 over the previous five years.
She said no.
“That turned out to be a false statement because we have copies of the deeds by which she conveyed these properties just eight or nine months earlier,” [Attorney Michael] Gartland said.
Gartland said the couple supports the lawsuit and he expects the court to reverse Davis’ transfers.
“This is a slam dunk as far as I’m concerned,” Gartland said. “These transfers will get undone and it will be as if her brother and her own them again... we will have a lien on these three properties and we will move to settle to get our clients paid.”
Gartland was specifically asking the court to nullify those transfers and use the inherited money to pay off her judgment.
Given all that damning evidence, how did Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver defend what Davis did? He said she totally told the truth under oath last year…
“She did not lie,” Staver said. “They asked a specific question, and she answered it exactly, truthfully the way they had asked it.”
The attorneys asked Davis to “identify each property you own, or in which you have an interest,” not the past-tense “owned,” according to a transcript of the December post-judgment discovery documents. The attorneys also used the present-tense when they asked about which trusts she is a beneficiary.
No one in their right mind would ever believe Kim Davis was technically honest because she was carefully parsing grammar.
It seemed pretty obvious she was deliberately lying about what she had done. And that was a problem since Kentucky has a law called the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act that says, among other things, property transfers can be voided if you were trying to hide it to avoid paying off a debt you owe. There was clear evidence that Davis hid her inheritance from the couple she owed money to, and that she transferred the land for “no monetary consideration,” further shielding how much she was actually worth.
In any case, Liberty Counsel said they were no longer working for Davis after that… though recent news reports suggest they’re back on the case. (Who knows.)
And now a federal judge has taken a big step again Davis.
On Friday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins ruled that there was clear evidence Davis had assets that she was not telling the court about. He is now giving her until November 16 to give the other side “full and complete responses” to questions about her assets and to explain to the judge “why she should not be sanctioned.”
Defendant [Davis] does not deny the existence of these certified public records, does not address if or why these documents are outside of the scope of Plaintiffs' requests, and gives no reason for not producing complete responses and documents…
At some point, she’s going to have to pay the price for what she did. After years and years of delay, it looks like the deadline is finally within sight.
Prayer ain't gonna get her out of this one.
The funny thing is that Davis always had a simple option available to her: If she didn’t want to sign same-sex marriage licenses after Obergefell, she could have resigned. She would have still been a “martyr” for conservative Christians everywhere! Instead, she insisted on staying in her job while breaking the law. She has since become a laughingstock for the nation—a symbol of Christian hubris, selfishness, and hate.
And now what’s she doing? Lying to the courts, apparently, to avoid paying a penalty for her actions. None of this is religious persecution. This is a woman who broke the law, dragged other people through the mud, and refuses to take any responsibility for anything.
It’s about damn time she pay up and be held in contempt—a decision that would lead to even more punishment.
(Portions of this article were published earlier)
She fucked around. She found out.
Surely one of her three former husbands could pony up some cash to protect the "sanctity of marriage."