Iowa district rejects ministry's offer to buy vacant building and launch Christian school
"We need to protect the school that we’re a part of," said one school board member
This newsletter is free, but it’s only able to sustain itself due to the support I receive from a small percentage of regular readers. Would you please consider becoming one of those supporters? You can use the button below to subscribe to Substack or use my usual Patreon page!
A public school board in Iowa rejected a bid from a Christian ministry that offered to buy a vacant building in order to create a private religious school.
The Waverly-Shell Rock Community Schools has two elementary schools that are no longer in use and they’ve been trying to figure out what to do with the properties. That means taking bids from interested parties and deciding if any of them are worthwhile. The district said it was not obligated to accept any proposal, nor did they have to “sell to the highest bidder.”
In addition to a $5,000 proposal for an arts center, and another $5,000 bid to build apartments, a Christian ministry called Inspired Life offered $70,000 to purchase one of the schools:
The intended use of the property will be for the founding of an accredited, private K-8 school called Waverly Christian School, which is planned to be “supported through a partnership with Waterloo Christian School.”
The school is expected to have 100 students the first year, and a capacity for 200 students. The proposal also envisions an accredited preschool center of approximately 30 kids.
The ministry wanted one school in particular but offered the same price for the other one if the first bid didn’t pan out.
Perhaps shockingly, though, last week, the school board unanimously rejected their offer. The ministry couldn’t make sense of it, writing on Facebook about how “disappointed” they were:
Inspired Life is disappointed that our offer to purchase property for the purpose of launching Waverly Christian School was voted down in a 5-0 decision by the Waverly-Shell Rock Community School Board. This decision was made despite Inspired Life submitting the highest financial offer on either of the available properties. We believe that communities benefit from having access to educational options that align with family values. Preventing the sale of a vacant school building and limiting access to educational options is not in the best interest of Waverly families. Our research demonstrates considerable demand for Waverly Christian School, and we will continue our pursuit of serving students and families by expanding educational opportunities in Waverly and across the State of Iowa.
They didn’t quite cry persecution, but the implication was obvious: We offered the most money so we deserved to get the building. But they didn’t point out what reasons, if any, the board members gave for rejecting their offer. (The school board doesn’t post recordings of its meetings online.)
Now, however, thanks to an article in the Courier by reporter Maria Kuiper, we have that answer.
Almost immediately after reading the motion to consider the bids for the private school, board member [Jes] Kettleson motioned to reject it. Newly elected board member Shawn Ellerbroek seconded.
“Every school dollar now, with the new (education savings accounts), goes away from the public school, and we are a public school,” Kettleson said. “But we need to protect the school that we’re a part of.”
…
“They want the public schools to be supported and strong,” [board member Dennis Epley] said. “Any money that we start offering to other programs limits the dollars we have (so) that we can have a strong school.”
Kettleson is referring to a new Iowa law, enacted earlier this year, which gives taxpayer dollars to families enrolling their kids in private schools. Nearly 19,000 kids were signed up to receive these vouchers this school year, at a cost of up to “$7,635 per student.” Critics of these ESAs have said the private/religious schools accepting these dollars may be unregulated, lack accountability, don’t necessarily accommodate students with special needs, and siphon away money that could be used to maintain and improve public schools.
So it makes a lot of sense for a public school board, whose primary obligation is to serve families receiving a public education, to reject a bid from a Christian school that would inevitably make life worse for public school students.
There’s nothing anti-Christian about that sentiment. It’s more like the public school board doesn’t want to contribute to its own demise. And they shouldn’t have to. There’s nothing stopping the Christian ministry from launching their school somewhere else. More importantly, the short term cash from any sale wouldn’t be worth the long-term damage to public education.
Kettleson and Epley did not respond to requests for comment, but I would love to see the school board issue a more formal statement about why they don’t believe selling the property to people eager to create a private school is in the best interest of the community.
It’s the right move. I worry, though, that conservatives will treat this as a story of Christian persecution when it’s really a story about how to best support public education.
I recently read that something on the order of 80% of the students receiving vouchers to attend private schools already attend those schools. Thus, tax payers wind up subsidizing private, religious education. There aren't many private schools in most places that do not have a religious affiliation. No religious institution should get one cent of public money for any reason. I see this as part of the long term goal of the religious right to destroy public education in this country.
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑜𝑜𝑑, 𝐼 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑖𝑡𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓; 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑖𝑡 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑖𝑡𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐺𝑜𝑑 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑖𝑡, 𝑠𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑝 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟, '𝑡𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛, 𝐼 𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑒ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑑, 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑑 𝑜𝑛𝑒.
-- Benjamin Franklin
As far as I'm concerned, secular government should have NOTHING to do with religion and religion likewise should have NOTHING to do with secular government. The school board's decision not to treat with a church organization is directly in line with this principle, and I applaud the school board members for their wise choice.
I only wish I saw such wisdom more often.