161 Comments
User's avatar
NOGODZ20's avatar

"All at no cost."

Given what Christianity has done to its victims AND its followers, I question that assertion.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

"No cost?" Har-de-har-har. Tell me another one. 😝

Expand full comment
Old Man Shadow's avatar

The cost is likely an actual education for these students.

Expand full comment
Eric's avatar

Is it a "Christian Value" to lie to the state about your school's intentions?

Expand full comment
MikeinSonoma's avatar

It’s an evangelical value to be conniving.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

Lying is right up there with ends justifying means.

Expand full comment
Val Uptuous NotAgain's avatar

It’s okay if it’s for Jesus.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

GMTA. Posted a split second apart.

Expand full comment
Sarah Longstaff's avatar

Evangelicals lie all the time. They justify it as “saving lives.”

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

And “souls.” Sun Myung Moon called his lying “Holy deception.”

Expand full comment
Joan the Dork's avatar

Holy deception; 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘺 deception- po-tay-to, po-tah-to.

Expand full comment
Kukaan Ei Missään's avatar

"What harm would it do, if a man told a good strong lie for the sake of the good and for the Christian church ... a lie out of necessity, a useful lie, a helpful lie, such lies would not be against God, he would accept them."

Martin Luther

Expand full comment
Len's avatar

“ … such lies would not be against God, he would accept them.‘

Non- believers clearly have higher moral standards than Christians and their god.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

It's SOP for Christians.

Expand full comment
Stephen Brady's avatar

Unfortunately, you are right. The christian nationalists want to subsume secular society. They don’t believe in any sort of separation of church and state. They don’t believe there should be any diversity of opinion. Their way is the only way and anyone who doesn’t agree with them can just jolly well stay silent. Edit: changed ‘van’ to ‘can’.

Expand full comment
Brianna Amore's avatar

And they literally don't understand why anybody would be upset about this.

Expand full comment
Stephen Brady's avatar

Because they are told by their Propagandist Preachers that they and they alone are blessed with Right Opinion.

Expand full comment
Kukaan Ei Missään's avatar

As far as I remember my Catholic upbringing, there are sins of commission and sins of omission. Not mentioning the "Christian character" of the school definitely sounds like a sin of omission.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

Yes.

Expand full comment
Val Uptuous NotAgain's avatar

I’m sorry, but strong academics and “traditional values” are contradictory. The traditional values that the Christian churches are touting, not actual values that people have had traditionally. The “traditional values” of the church are reliant upon ignorance and fear. Strong academics demand learning, taking in new information even if it doesn’t line up with what we think we know and allaying fear through understanding. “Traditional values” demands unquestioned obedience and letting god do the understanding.

This school is screaming incompetence.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

↑↑↑↑↑↑↑

THIS!!!

Expand full comment
Joe King's avatar

𝑅𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑙’𝑠 𝐶ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑅𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑒’𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑠.

Because of course they had to lie to push it through. Because it is demonstrably unconstitutional.

“𝐸𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑛𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 … 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑠𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑒,” 𝑏𝑜𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑀𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝐻𝑒𝑖𝑙 𝑠𝑎𝑖𝑑.

𝐵𝑜𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑜𝑟𝑖 𝑇ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑠𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑, “𝐽𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.”

Board president Lori Thompson needs a 5th grade civics class. By her logic, neither is "separation of powers" or "checks and balances", yet those principles are definitely there. Time for another email to a school board.

Expand full comment
ericc's avatar

The 2nd amendment doesn't say anything about guns, either.

Expand full comment
Donrox's avatar

info@d49.org

Let's all let them know what the constitution means!

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

No prior mention of the school's Christian basis? Hardly surprising, as Christians repeatedly practice deception to achieve their goals.

Expand full comment
Old Man Shadow's avatar

My Christian education taught me Lost Cause mythology for History and 6-day Creationism and a 6,000 year old Earth mythology for Science.

It also greatly implied that Scientists were stupid liars who were wrong because they started with a presupposition that magic wasn't real.

So even setting aside the very important Church/State separation question, I question strongly whether or not these children will receive an actual education or just fundamentalist indoctrination.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

Actually, it wasn't a presupposition, in re: magic. Just the same conditions as for any other hypothesis: demonstrate a given proposal with evidence, allow others to use the same techniques to verify and validate said proposal, then peer review to confirm.

Under those conditions, magic tends to run away, screaming. 😝

Expand full comment
ericc's avatar
6hEdited

Yes exactly. Naturalism isn't the premise, it's the conclusion.

It may be empirical. It may be provisional. But it's held up just fine so far.

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

They'll receive the latter. Count on it.

Christians who falsely accuse others of grooming are the biggest groomers of all.

Expand full comment
Stephen Brady's avatar

They won’t. Many years ago, Hemant posted a page from a christian home schooling book which told kids that ‘nobody actually knew how electricity works’. They want a populace completely unable to think who rely on authoritarian preachers to tell them everything to believe and everything they are allowed to think. Christianity has been a religion for the greater glory of ignorance from its very inception.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

Electricity comes from holes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHDv7NKmLnA

Expand full comment
Joe King's avatar

(Sent to Lori Thompson, the school board president. Subject line: Riverstone Academy constitutionality.)

Ms. Thompson:

As a veteran of the US Navy, and a concerned citizen if the United States, I find it troubling that in the October 9 board meeting you States that the separation of church and state was not contained in the United States Constitution. As president of the school board, one would think that you would have at least a basic understanding of how our government is supposed to function.

The phrase "separation of powers" is not in the Constitution, but Articles I-III set up that principle. We have a judicial branch, a legislative branch, and an executive branch, each exercising a portion of government power separate frome one another. This also sets up a system of checks and balances (another phrase not directly in the text of the Constitution) such that no one branch should be allowed greater authority than any other.

Therefore, the fact that the phrase "separation of church and state" is not directly present in the Constitution does not mean that the principle is not there. The Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause work together to erect that wall of separation. By preventing infringement of the right to freely exercise one's beliefs, the government becomes separate from disfavored religious practice. By preventing mandatory belief, the government becomes separate from favored religious practice. I hope this explanation helps you to better understand the constitutional principle of separation of church and state.

The separation of church and state, thus established, therefore makes it unconstitutional for the government (that is you) to allow an explicitly religious public school (that is Riverstone Academy). That is establishment of religion, in direct violation of the Establishment Clause.

Joseph King, concerned American.

Expand full comment
Tinker's avatar

I have zero doubt that she believes in the separation of powers either. People who are trying to break down the wall of separation are also on the side of the fascists that have taken over our government. These are the Christians that are not worshiping Jesus Christ, they are worshiping Donald Trump.

Expand full comment
ericc's avatar
6hEdited

Eh I don't think you're ever going to win the 'separation of church and state' semantic argument. They are willingly obtuse about it.

What we should be banging on is that this is the state establishing religion. The local kids are literally compelled by the state to go to that school, where they must learn Christian religion. And establishment is directly forbidden by the 1a, in plain language.

Expand full comment
Jstn Green's avatar

GREAT letter. Thanks for sending it.

Expand full comment
MikeinSonoma's avatar

“Just a note of clarification, separation of church and state is not contained in the United States Constitution.”

Thomas Jefferson described the first amendment as a wall between church and site, separating it. I wonder who’s lying, creepy religious lady or Thomas Jefferson, one of the author of the first amendment? How about the constitution doesn’t have the words freedom of religion in it.

Excerpt From

The Founding Myth

Andrew L Seidel, Susan Jacoby & Dan Barker

“…Our Constitution’s only references to religion are exclusionary. It excludes the state from involving itself in religion (the First Amendment’s “free exercise” clause) and excludes religion from involving itself in the state (the First Amendment’s “establishment” clause: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”)”

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

"No religious test for public office," either.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

US Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 3. Just in case anyone's curious.

Expand full comment
wreck's avatar

"Hands-On Trade-Based Learning"

In a kindergarten to 5th grade school. Got to train those little fingers to put those tiny screws in the I-Phones.

Expand full comment
Sarah Longstaff's avatar

As Dave Ramsey preaches, people in debt deserve to be enslaved. So train them young, pay them too little, and brainwash them into accepting indentured servitude to the Broligarchy.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

Dave Ramsey bills himself as a financial guru. He gives advice for perfect people. Real people make mistakes and need advice to recover and to forgive themselves.

Not to mention he's a general asshole.

Expand full comment
Joan the Dork's avatar

Any time you hear the words "hands-on" and "Christian" in the same sales pitch... 𝘳𝘶𝘯.

Expand full comment
Boreal's avatar

If their cult had merit, they wouldn't need to groom young minds to add adherents. Grooming by xtians usually also means sexual abuse.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

At minimum, it means Christian indoctrination and borderline brainwashing (and that borderline is damned thin).

Expand full comment
Boreal's avatar

Usually these RWNJs that push religion like this are the same people that accuse others of (sexually) grooming children. Every accusation by them, a confession.

Expand full comment
vibing.'s avatar

Christian purity culture is basically microdosing sexual abuse...

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

Ain't it the truth?

Expand full comment
Mommadillo's avatar

So we can expect public schools focused on Judaism and Islam in the days to come?

Can’t wait for the Satanist schools - bet they’ll be popular.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

Personally, I'm waiting for them to tackle the Hindu pantheon. You could get LOST in that mess! 🤣

Expand full comment
Sarah Longstaff's avatar

This kind of education isn’t just “Christian,” it’s cult Christian. We’re not talking about the Jesuits who taught Nelson Mandela or the Anglicans who taught Desmond Tutu. We’re talking about the use of coded language to exert cult mind control. Eg “classical” = White Supremacist, although they would never tell parents that. If you examine the language used in curricula like this you can feel it—like kudzu vines, warped fun-house mirrors, and empty spaces. They strategically twist narratives and exclude pertinent details. As for “violating the Constitution,” does this school force students to pledge allegiance to the Christian flag? Most Christian Nationalists don’t give a crap about a “worldly” Constitution. They think their god is going to come back and crown himself king. And the ones who do pretend to care about the Constitution no doubt support the Convention of the States movement to change it more to their liking.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

I suspect it's also the kind of indoctrination that is a direct result of the decrease in church attendance and the rise of the nones. The people who promote schools like Riverside know at one level or another that they are losing traction. They are terrified of that and desperate to hold onto whatever ground they call theirs, and perhaps take back some as well.

Yeah, they ARE desperate ... and that makes them DANGEROUS.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

"A Christian PUBLIC school?!?" That's a contradiction in terms if ever I heard one. Frankly, there is NO WAY IN HELL that the Riverside school should get ANY PUBLIC FUNDING WHATSOEVER, any more than any straight-up private religious school should.

Strikes me that Riverside and its supporters are trying to pull a fast one. They need to be stopped in their tracks.

Expand full comment
Joan the Dork's avatar

Another instance of the camel's nose poking into the tent. How many times have we had to push that creepy critter back out, now?

...actually, can we maybe get a 𝘯𝘦𝘸 tent? Everywhere you look, there's another camel nose. I'm beginning to suspect that the tent we're in is 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 of camel noses.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

I think we're far past the nose. We're at least to the hump. We may even be seeing the base of the tail.

Expand full comment
Maltnothops's avatar

That’s quite the image. I’m assuming the camels are all voyeurs looking for porn.

Expand full comment
Joan the Dork's avatar

I mean, according to their browsing habits...

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

Independently of the religious indoctrination, and as Wreck pointed out, why is there mention of trade-learning for a school for children aged 5/6 to 10/11 ?

Trade-learning (or apprenticeship) is demanding. How much of curriculum public schools follow will be sacrificed in this private school ?

Expand full comment
Val Uptuous NotAgain's avatar

They do t mention which trade. It may only be ministry. I mean, all the religions are losing congregants, but also have a deficit in clergy as well.

Expand full comment
Donrox's avatar

Retired minister here. Trade? My hands are still as smooth as they ever were!

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

No papercuts? : )

Expand full comment
Vanity Unfair's avatar

Not a librarian.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

It's a red flag for me. Why not mention it on their page/website if it's the only trade they will teach ? You would think a school openly bragging about their religious teaching would put this forward.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

Home economics for girls and shop for boys, although those don't usually start until Junior High.

I took both.

Expand full comment
Maltnothops's avatar

We had a Home Ec for Boys class. I made a down vest from a kit for sewing. We baked. We learned how to properly clean a house.

I avoided shop mainly because it sounded like there was a lot of hazing and assholery. Boys sabatoging other’s projects. Also, I was a snob.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

I nearly lost two fingers in shop. And nearly passed out when the teacher used me as an example to the class. Otherwise it was mostly fun, we didn't have the hazing issues. A boy in Home Ec on the other hand... And why call it Home *Economics* if it doesn't teach practical money management skills?

Expand full comment
Maltnothops's avatar

My kids had a mandatory “financial literacy” class in high school. I don’t know how effective it was.

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar
2hEdited

It needs to teach how to save, how to handle credit and debt, and help the students understand that managing money is only partly about the math (the easy part), but also about managing yourself. And you will fail sometimes, but you can recover.

Balancing a checkbook isn’t really a skill even when it was relevant, which in an age of online banking and instant transactions it really isn’t. I doubt I’m the only person who writes maybe 5 checks a year. Making and sticking to a budget is a matter of discipline (which I lack) and you will screw up at times. And sometimes despite the best plan, shit happens and everything has to be re-thought. Work through the options before you commit. Calculators, spreadsheets, and today, AIs are good at the math of this.

Edit: There's a new blog that claims to offer some of this. dear18yoself.substack.com

Expand full comment
ericc's avatar

My kid did too.

I support kids taking both, though our personal experience was that the Home Ec was a fluff course stuck in the past, while the shop course was doing stuff like CAD design and 3-D printing. They really need to buff up Home Ec for the 21st century.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

I made a very manly quitted rifle cozy and learned how to make cinnamon rolls. I think the gun case is still around here somewhere, the cinnamon rolls are not. CAD and 3-D printing weren't invented yet. I do remember making a plastic injection screwdriver handle. Our shop teacher had stereotypical missing fingers.

Eta: Freshman year, we did learn drafting, no computers involved. I was pretty good at it. So much so that I considered becoming and architect, but I really wanted to be a city planner. (That last part is a joke.)

Expand full comment
cdbunch's avatar

SimCity.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

SimCity 3000. I can't handle the newer ones.

Expand full comment
Black Hole and DM mourner's avatar

Same here. We have a first, and very limited contact with a trade* by making stuff (like electric or electronic devices), in 6th and 7th grades, but you can't go to a trade-learning public school before 8th grade or 14 years old. No home economics or shops in standard public schools.

*The only exception is sports but the training come en plus of the same curriculum as any public school, meaning the work load is heavier.

Expand full comment
larry parker's avatar

I learned electrical stuff in Boy Scouts (how to make an electrical motor). I also had one of those Radio Shack 101 electric devices kits or whatever it was called.

Expand full comment
Troublesh00ter's avatar

I used to rewind my own motors back when I was into slot-car racing. Got to be pretty good at that, too. Damn, those were fun times!

Expand full comment
NOGODZ20's avatar

I took an “Electronics School” course where you graduated by building a working radio.

Expand full comment
Joan the Dork's avatar

Gotta teach the worker drones to be productive and obedient early, before they catch delusions of making their own life choices.

Expand full comment
JoyLynn's avatar

That struck me, too. Are they training them to be child laborers, undoing child labor laws?

Expand full comment