Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Straw's avatar

I wonder why I'm not surprised. A church valuing a preacher as more important than teenagers and children. Who would have thought?

Expand full comment
Richard Wade's avatar

An old-fashioned term for clergy is "a man of the cloth." The "cloth" they wear is armor tougher than layers of titanium and Kevlar.

I was an alternate juror on a case against a megachurch employee, a middle-aged father running the youth musical department of the congregation. He was accused by his two teenage daughters of molesting them on multiple occasions. The first trial ended with a hung jury, and the second trial, which I attended, also ended with a hung jury. The evidence was pretty damning, and I'm convinced that if I had been able to participate in the jury deliberations, they would have convicted him. (Alternate jurors hear all the evidence, but are barred from the jury room during their deliberations.) Apparently, somebody on each jury simply could not bring themselves to convict "a man of the cloth." Some religious folks are impervious to evidence. They think that believing something with strong conviction makes that thing true.

To my even deeper disappointment, the D.A. decided not to pursue the case a third time, and the charges were dropped. As with this case, the church declared this LACK of a conclusive trial a "vindication" for the perp.

Expand full comment
169 more comments...

No posts